科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 164-172.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

使命驱动科创企业产品突破性创新实现的路径

李树文1,罗瑾琏2,唐慧洁2,胡文安3,柳乐2   

  1. 1.大连理工大学 经济管理学院,辽宁 大连116024;
    2.同济大学 经济与管理学院,上海201804;
    3.山东大学 山东省人才发展战略研究院,山东 济南250199

  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 修回日期:2021-01-05 出版日期:2023-01-20 发布日期:2023-01-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡文安
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目:“内化于心何以外显于行:创新使命的多层意义建构及对企业突破性创新影响效应研究”(72072128,2021.01—2024.12);国家自然科学基金项目:“新员工适应与创新行为如何协同共生?双元领导干预过程及有效性研究”(72002154,2021.01—2023.12);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目:“从价值交易到价值共创的国有企业价值转型研究:企业与客户双向互动的视角”(L22CGL008,2022.10—2023.09);“数字化生产力工具突破性创新的实现条件与迭代过程研究”(DUT22RC(3)008,2022.03—2023.12)。

Realization path for radical product innovation of the mission-driven S&T enterprises

Li Shuwen1, Luo Jinlian2, Tang Huijie2, Hu Wenan3, Liu Le2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China;  2. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;  3. Shandong Institute of Talent Development Strategy, Shandong University, Jinan 250199, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Revised:2021-01-05 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-01-18

摘要: 科创板推行以来,度量其重点是企业是否实现了产品突破性创新。产品突破性创新是组织获得市场竞争优势、掌握先进技术、突破技术封锁的重要途径,而使命是驱动企业实现产品突破性创新的精神支柱。但现有研究关于在使命驱动情境下企业如何更好的实现产品突破性创新这一问题尚未得到深入探讨。本文基于权变观,以科创企业为例,从领导行为与意义建构的动态匹配视角出发,选取极具典型性和极端性的HB生物医药企业进行案例分析,研究揭示了在使命驱动情境下,科创企业使命的导入、认同、内化三种使命形式分别驱动着产品突破性创新实现萌芽、形成、强化的三个阶段。针对产品突破性创新的不同阶段,通过授权、命令、双元领导与不同意义建构主体的有效适配促进产品突破性创新实现,并由此形成领导行为与意义建构的附助性匹配、补偿性匹配及整合性匹配三种动态匹配模式。本文从使命驱动、领导行为与意义建构的动态匹配视角揭示了产品突破性创新的实现过程,为科创企业创新管理实践提供了参考借鉴。

关键词: 使命驱动, 领导行为, 意义建构, 动态匹配, 产品突破性创新

Abstract:

     Since the implementation of science and technology innovation board, it is increasingly important for science and technology innovation to play a decisive role in China′s economic development, strategic implementation and competitive advantage. As a latecomer of technological innovation, China has gradually narrowed its technological gap with developed countries by introducing technology for incremental innovation, and achieved rapid economic development. However, this incremental innovation mode cannot achieve transcendence and breakthrough. The lack of leading power of science and technology makes Chinese enterprises often encounter the containment of foreign enterprises in chip supply, core patents and other aspects. As a carrier of innovation, only by focusing on the radical innovation based on new products and new technologies, mastering leading technologies and manufacturing advanced products, can scientific and technological enterprises be invincible in the fierce competition and effectively serve the national strategy. Radical innovation can greatly improve product performance, reshape the market position of enterprises, and fundamentally change their technological trajectory and organizational ability. It is an important basis for enterprises to obtain and maintain sustainable competitive advantage. Recent studies have clearly pointed out that mission driven can become the source power of new innovation paradigm. Under the background of the implementation of innovation driven strategy in China and the repeated "neck jamming" of foreign incumbent enterprises, radical product innovation has become a mission-driven innovation based on major national strategies and public interests, which can contribute to coping with major social challenges. Therefore, this study aims to explore how to achieve radical product innovation in the mission-driven context.

      Based on the contingency view, this paper takes the scientific and technological innovation enterprises as a case, and from the perspective of dynamic matching of leadership and sense-making, selects the typical HB biomedical enterprises for case analysis. We found, first, in the context of mission-driven, the three mission forms of mission introduction, identification and internalization drive the three stages of radical product innovation (germination, formation and strengthening); second, according to the different stages of radical product innovation, enterprises should fully consider the matching of leadership and sense-making, and promote the realization of radical product innovation through the effective adaptation of authorization, command, ambidextrous leadership and different sense-making subjects; third, there are three dynamic matching modes of leadership and sense-making, which are complementary matching, complementary matching and integrated matching, and they evolve in turn in the process of radical product innovation.

     The theoretical contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in two aspects: firstly, this paper details the current mission-driven innovation research, conceptualizes the mission-driven innovation based on major social challenges at the macro level into a three-stage mission driven process in the innovation activities at the organizational level, which provides specific ideas for the future research on the materialization of organizational mission. Meanwhile, from the perspective of internal evolution of innovation, this paper reveals the formation mechanism of radical product innovation in the mission-driven context, and expands the innovation management context, which lays the foundation for further answering the question of "how to achieve radical product innovation in the mission-driven context". 

     Secondly, from the perspective of dynamic matching, this paper makes up for the lack of previous studies on the analysis of organizational mission from the perspective of sense-making or leadership, reveals the internal mechanism of mission-driven innovation theory, promotes the development of mission-driven innovation theory from the macro framework based on major social challenges to the specific management practice at the organizational level, and answers the question of how to match sense-making with the leadership can better achieve radical product innovation in mission-driven context. It also contributes to the in-depth conditional research of sense-making and leadership in future innovation activities, that is, we should comprehensively consider the conditional choice in the substantiation research, and choose the corresponding way of sense-making and leadership in different stages of innovation.

Key words: mission-driven, leadership behavior, sense-making, dynamic matching, radical product innovation