科研管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 23-31.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

竞争劣势、买方势力与本土制造商的研发策略

李世杰1,李伟2   

  1. 1.海南大学经济学院,海南 海口570228;
    2.中国社会科学院工业经济研究所,北京100836
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-09 修回日期:2019-09-15 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-04-21
  • 通讯作者: 李世杰
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目:“互联网平台企业策略性行为及反垄断规制研究”(71963012,2020.01-2023.12);国家自然科学基金项目:“跨国公司滥用市场支配地位的作用机理、经济效应和规制研究——基于市场势力细分的理论视角”(71903196,2020.01-2022.12)。

The optimal R&D strategies for local manufactures under the background of competitive disadvantage and buyer power

Li Shijie1, Li Wei2   

  1. 1. School of Economics, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Hainan, China;
    2. Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100836, China
  • Received:2019-01-09 Revised:2019-09-15 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-04-21
  • Supported by:
    A mechanism research of Knowledge modular for generalized manufacturing system oriented industry cluster

摘要: 本土制造商在面对进入中国市场并拥有成熟技术和商业模式的跨国公司,处于相对竞争劣势地位;而流通领域中拥有品牌、渠道优势的大型零售组织,也形成对本土制造商的买方势力;横向竞争劣势与纵向买方势力,恶化了中国本土制造商所处的市场环境。本文从企业所处市场环境出发,考察了本土制造商相对于国外制造商的横向竞争劣势,以及下游企业相对于本土制造商的纵向买方势力对自主研发激励的影响。研究结果表明:横向竞争劣势和纵向买方势力的增强降低了本土制造商最优研发水平,是导致本土企业创新较弱的重要原因。基于此,论文提出了本土制造商与大型零售商进行纵向合作研发,促进本土制造商研发能力提升的应对策略。通过构建三种成本分担形式下的合作研发决策模型,给出了本土制造商合作研发的最优模式选择:当买方势力较小时,最优的合作研发策略是根据利润增量决定研发成本分担;当买方势力较大时,最优的合作研发策略是根据本土制造商自身利润最大化决定研发成本分担。

关键词: 竞争劣势, 买方势力, 研发决策, 纵向合作研发, 研发成本分担

Abstract: Innovation is an important way for companies to gain and maintain core competitive advantages. However, at present, the overall R&D level of China′s manufacturing industry is relatively low, and the independent R&D capability is relatively weak, which restricts the high-quality development of the manufacturing industry. In this context, enhancing the R&D level of local manufacturers plays an important role in improving the international competitiveness of China′s manufacturing industry and promoting the upgrading of industrial structure. There are many factors influencing the innovation ability of local manufacturers. Existing literatures mostly focus on the impact of foreign manufacturers on China′s manufacturing innovation after the reform and opening up. They believe that foreign manufacturers have brought advanced technology. The industry has produced a technology spillover effect that has boosted the level of manufacturing innovation. However, foreign manufacturers tend to have relatively mature technology and business models compared to local manufacturers and their products are higher quality, which makes local manufacturers in a competitive disadvantage. Competitive disadvantages may have a negative impact on the innovation of Chinese manufacturers. In addition, in the field of circulation, with the merger and development of large retail organizations such as Carrefour, Wal-Mart, and Tesco, the concentration of the retail market continues to increase. While these large retailers continue to meet the changing needs of consumers, they have mastered a large number of consumer resources, formed a huge brand and channel advantages, enhanced their position in the supply chain, and enhanced the buyer power relative to local manufacturers. Buyer power may also be an important factor in the decline in the level of R&D by local manufacturers. In summary, Chinese local manufacturers stay in a comparative competitive disadvantage position when facing the multinational companies with mature technology and business models; while large retail organizations with brand and channel advantages, enhance their comparative advantages with Chinese local manufacturers. The horizontal competitive disadvantage and vertical buyer power together worsen the market environment of Chinese local manufacturers. This paper studies local manufacturers′ innovation from the perspective of industrial organization theory, examines the impact of the competitive relationship between foreign manufacturers and local manufacturers on the level of innovation of local manufacturers, and explores strategies to promote local manufacturers to improve their innovation level. Specifically, this paper constructs a vertical relationship model composed of a foreign manufacturer and a local manufacturer in the upstream and a retailer in the downstream, and studies a fur-stage game model. In the first stage of the game, foreign manufacturer and local manufacturer decide their optical R&D input; in the second stage of the game, the foreign manufacturer negotiates with downstream retailer to determine trade contract; in the third stage of the game, the downstream retailer set up trade contract for the local manufacturer, and the local manufacturer either accepts it or leave it; in the fourth stage of the game, the foreign manufacturer competes with local manufacturer for retail price competition. By solving the game model, this paper discusses the optimal R&D decision of local manufacturer when foreign manufacturer has horizontal competition with local manufacturer and large buyer has buyer power relative to local manufacturer. The study shows that the horizontal competitive disadvantage and vertical buyer power are important reason for the weak innovation of local enterprises. With the increases of the horizontal competition disadvantage of the local manufacturer, the level of R&D of the local manufacturer declines with the increase of buyer power of the downstream retailer, the R&D level of the local manufacturer also declines. Based on this conclusion, the paper proposes a coping strategy for local manufacturer which is vertical cooperation between the local manufacturer and the large retailer. By constructing a cooperative R&D decision-making model under three cost-sharing forms, the optimal cooperative R&D model choice for local manufacturers′ cooperative R&D is studied. The study found that when the buyer′s power is small, the optimal cooperative R&D strategy is to determine the R&D cost sharing ratio according to the profit increment; when the buyer′s power is large, the optimal cooperative R&D strategy is to determine the R&D cost sharing ratio according to the local manufacturer′s own profit maximization decision.

Key words: competitive disadvantage, buyer power, R&D, vertical cooperative R&D, R&D cost sharing