科研管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 157-165.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨学科团队与跨学科研究成果产出来自科学基金重大研究计划的实证

汪雪锋,张娇,李佳,乔亚丽   

  1. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京100081
  • 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-13

Interdisciplinary research teams and interdisciplinary gains—An empirical analysis based on NSFC major research plans

Wang Xuefeng, Zhang Jiao, Li Jia, Qiao Yali   

  1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-13

摘要: 目前国际上比较有前景的新兴学科大多具有跨学科性质,跨学科研究也成为当代科学探索的热点范式,其主要是通过超越以往分门别类的研究方式,实现对问题的整合性研究。基于“投入-产出”原则,本文分别构建了研究团队(“投入”)及其研究成果(“产出”)的跨学科测度方法,并以国家自然科学基金委资助的重大研究计划项目为案例对象,探讨跨学科研究团队是否有助于产出跨学科研究成果。实证研究表明,跨学科研究团队与跨学科研究成果产出之间并无明显的相关关系,但存在较为明显的学科差异。研究结果有助于为相关管理部门或研究机构推进跨学科研究工作具有借鉴指导意义。

关键词: 跨学科研究, 集成化指数, 平均链接强度, 重大研究计划, 研究团队

Abstract: At present, emerging disciplines with greater prospect in the world are mostly interdisciplinary. Interdisciplinary research has also become a hot paradigm of contemporary scientific exploration, and it mainly realizes the integrated research of problems through the research methods that have been classified in the past. In this paper, based on the principle of "input-output", interdisciplinary measurement method of the research teams (“input”) and its research results (“output”) is established and taking NSFC major research plans as a case, whether the interdisciplinary research teams is contributed to the achievement of interdisciplinary research is explored. The empirical research shows that there is no obvious correlation between the interdisciplinary research teams and its achievement, but there are obvious differences of disciplines. The results will have a reference guidance for the related administrative departments or research institutions to promote interdisciplinary researches.

Key words: interdisciplinary research, integration index, mean linkage strength, NSFC major research plan, research team