网络搜寻结构类型的探索及作用机理研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 47-54.

网络搜寻结构类型的探索及作用机理研究

宋晶¹, 孙永磊¹, 谢永平²

1. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084;
2. 西安电子科技大学经济管理学院, 陕西西安 710071

收稿日期:2013-09-09 修回日期:2015-04-27 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-21
通讯作者: 宋晶
作者简介:宋晶(1983-),女,山西洪洞人,博士,清华大学经济管理学院博士后,研究方向为技术创新理论与管理.
孙永磊(1984-),男,河南封丘人,博士,清华大学经济管理学院博士后,研究方向为技术创新理论与管理.
谢永平(1972-),男,陕西渭南人,博士,西安电子科技大学经济管理学院副教授,研究方向为技术创新理论与管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金:制造企业服务化战略对供应链网络结构及绩效的影响——基于嵌入性视角的研究(71272117),起止时间:2013.01-2016.12;国家自然科学基金:核心企业成长与创新网络扩张共生演变(71172200),起止时间:2015.01-2018.12;国家自然科学基金:核心企业领导力在技术创新战略联盟中的作用机理研究(71472144),起止时间:2012.01-2015.12;陕西省重点学科建设专项资金资助项目(107-00X901)。

The exploration of network search structure type and its effect mechanism

Song Jing¹, Sun Yonglei¹, Xie Yongping²

1. Economics Management School, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. School of Economics & Management, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, Shaanxi, China

Received:2013-09-09 Revised:2015-04-27 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文主要探索合作创新网络背景下企业网络化搜寻的主要结构类型及其作用机理,首先,借鉴扎根理论的研究方法,通过三次深度访谈,发现知识搜寻、关系搜寻和惯例搜寻是企业网络搜寻的主要结构类型。同时,以西安高新区高技术企业合作网络等为对象进行问卷调查,对网络搜寻的作用机理进行实证检验,结果显示,适度的关系搜寻有助于企业获得更高的合作创新绩效;知识搜寻不仅有利于合作创新绩效的提升,而且还在关系搜寻与合作创新绩效之间充当部分中介作用;惯例搜寻与合作创新绩效之间的正向关系通过实证检验,而且惯例搜寻还正向调控知识搜寻对合作创新绩效的影响。

关键词: 网络搜寻, 知识搜寻, 关系搜寻, 惯例搜寻, 作用机理

Abstract: This paper explored the main structure types and effect mechanism of the enterprise network search in the context of technological innovation network. First, by learning from the grounded theory and through 3 in-depth interviews, we found the main types of enterprise network search are knowledge search, relationships search and routine search. Meanwhile, we surveyed the cooperation networks of Xi'an High-tech enterprise as the object, and did an empirical test on the effect mechanism of network search. The results show that, moderate relationship search helps companies to achieve higher cooperation innovation performance, and that knowledge search not only improves cooperation innovation performance, but also has an intermediary role between relationship search and cooperation innovation performance, and that the positive relationship between routine search and cooperation innovation performance is passed through empirical testing, and that routine search also has a positively regulated relationship between knowledge search and cooperative innovation performance.

Key words: network search, knowledge search, relationship search, routine search, effect mechanism

中图分类号:

F271.3

宋晶, 孙永磊, 谢永平. 网络搜寻结构类型的探索及作用机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11): 47-54.

Song Jing, Sun Yonglei, Xie Yongping. The exploration of network search structure type and its effect mechanism[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 47-54.

参考文献

[1]魏江,黄学,刘洋.基于组织模块化与技术模块化"同构/异构"协同的跨边界研发网络架构[J].中国工业经济, 2014(4):148-160.Wei J., Huang X., Liu Y.. Building cross-boundary R&D network based on the isomeric/isomorphic synergy between organizational modularization and technological modularization[J].China Industrial Economy, 2014(4):148-160. [2]党兴华,孙永磊.技术创新网络位置对网络惯例的影响研究——以组织间信任为中介变量[J].科研管理,2013, 34(4):1-8.Dang X., Sun Y.. Impact of technological innovation network position on network routines:Taking inter-organizational trust as a mediative variable[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(4):1-8. [3]熊伟,奉小斌,陈丽琼.国外跨界搜寻研究回顾与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2011, 33(6):18-26.Xiong W., Feng X., Chen L..A foreign review of the literature of straddling search and future prospects[J].Foreign Economics & Management, 2011, 33(6):18-26. [4]袁健红,龚天宇.企业知识搜寻前因和结果研究现状探析与整合框架构建[J].外国经济与管理, 2011, 33(6):27-33.Yuan J., Gong T.. A review of the literature of enterprise knowledge search and future prospects[J].Foreign Economics & Management, 2011, 33(6):27-33. [5] Zhang Y., Li H.. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster:The role of ties with service intermediaries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(1):88-109. [6]邬爱其,李生校.从"到哪里学习"转向"向谁学习"——专业知识搜寻战略对新创集群企业创新绩效的影响[J].科学学研究, 2011, 29(12):1906-1913.Wu A., Li S.. From "where to learn" to "whom to learn from":Exploring the influence of specialized knowledge search strategies on innovation performance of new cluster firms[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29(12):1906-1913. [7] De Clercq D., Sapienza H., Yavuz R., Zhou L.. Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research:Past accomplishments and future directions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(1):143-165. [8] Laursen K., Salter A.. Open for innovation:The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2):131-150. [9] Katila R.. New product search over time:Past ideas in their prime?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(5):995-1010. [10] Boschma R., Eriksson R., Lindgren U.. How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2009, 9(2):169-190. [11] Aloini D., Martini A.. Exploring the exploratory search for innovation:A structural equation modelling test for practices and performance[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2013, 61(1):23-46. [12] Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A.. Beyond local search:Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(4):287-306. [13] Rerup C., Feldman M.. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata:The role of trial-and-error learning[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(3):577-610. [14]李玲.技术创新网络中企业间依赖,企业开放度对合作绩效的影响[J].南开管理评论, 2011, 14(4):16-24.Li L.. Research on the influence of enterprises dependence and openness to cooperation performance in technological innovation network[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2011, 14(4):16-24. [15]孙永磊,党兴华,宋晶.基于网络惯例的双元能力对合作创新绩效的影响[J].管理科学, 2014, 27(2):38-47.Sun Y., Dang X., Song J.. Impacts of ambidexterity competence on cooperative innovation performance based on network routines[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2014, 27(2):38-47. [16] Lavie D., Haunschild P., Khanna P.. Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(12):1453-1479. [17] Kim S., Arthurs J., Sahaym A., Cullen J.. Search behavior of the diversified firm:The impact of fit on innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(8):999-1009. [18] Grimpe C., Sofka W.. Search patterns and absorptive capacity:Low-and high-technology sectors in european countries[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(3):495-506. [19] Laursen K.. Keep searching and you'll find:What do we know about variety creation through firms' search activities for innovation?[J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2012, 21(5):1181-1220. [20]王永伟,马洁,吴湘繁,刘胜春.变革型领导行为、组织学习倾向与组织惯例更新的关系研究[J].管理世界, 2012(9):110-119.Wang Y., Ma J., Wu X., Liu S.. A study on the relationship between the behavior of the transformational leadership,the orientation to organizational learning and the updating of organizational routines[J]. Management World, 2012(9):110-119. [21]孙永磊,党兴华,宋晶.网络惯例形成的影响因素探索及实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2014, 32(2):267-275.Sun Y., Dang X., Song J..What factors influence the formation of network routines?[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2014, 32(2):267-275. [22] Classen N., Van Gils A., Bammens Y., Carree M.. Accessing resources from innovation partners:The search breadth of family SMEs[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2012, 50(2):191-215.