营销-制造整合对新产品开发绩效的影响研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 1-10.

• 论文 • 下一篇

营销-制造整合对新产品开发绩效的影响研究

孔婷¹, 孙林岩², 冯泰文³

1. 上海理工大学管理学院, 上海 200093;
2. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710049;
3. 西北工业大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710072

收稿日期:2013-11-12 修回日期:2015-01-28 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-09-18
通讯作者: 孔婷
作者简介:孔婷(1985-),女(汉),陕西西安人,上海理工大学管理学院讲师,研究方向为合作创新管理和供应链管理。
孙林岩(1955-2013),男(汉),陕西承德人,西安交通大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为服务型制造和供应链管理。
冯泰文(1982-),男(汉),山东高密人,西北工业大学管理学院副教授,主要研究方向为企业合作创新。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科青年基金(批准号:13YJC630031,起止时间:2013.01-2015.12);教育部博士点基金(批准号:20136102120066,起止时间:2014.01-2016.12);陕西省软科学研究计划(批准号:2014KRM39,起止时间:2014.01-2014.12);上海理工大学博士启动费项目(批准号: BSQD201503,起止时间:2015.04-2017.04)。

Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration across new product development on performance

Kong Ting¹, Sun Linyan², Feng Taiwen³

1. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
2. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
3. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, Shaanxi, China

Received:2013-11-12 Revised:2015-01-28 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在新产品开发过程中如何有效开展营销-制造整合是制造企业面临的重要课题。基于资源依赖理论,本文构建了新产品开发四个基本阶段的营销-制造整合之间的依赖关系及其与新产品开发绩效的关系模型,并基于中国214家制造企业的调研数据进行实证研究。结构方程模型分析结果表明,新产品开发早期阶段的营销-制造整合对后续阶段的整合程度具有显著的正向影响;市场分析、技术开发与产品测试阶段的营销-制造整合对新产品开发成本的控制具有显著的正向影响;市场分析和产品测试阶段的营销-制造整合对新产品开发速度具有显著的正向影响;新产品开发成本与新产品开发速度均对市场绩效具有显著的正向影响。

关键词: 营销-制造整合, 新产品开发阶段, 新产品开发绩效, 实证研究

Abstract: How to implement effectively the marketing-manufacturing integration (MMI) across various stages in new product development (NPD) process is an important research topic. Based on the resource-dependency theory, a conceptual model of the influences of MMI in each of four stages of the NPD process as well as their links to three types of NPD performance has been constructed and empirically tested by using data collected from 214 manufacturing firms in China. The analysis results of SEM reveal that stronger MMI accomplished early in NPD is associated with stronger MMI in later stages of NPD. The results also suggest that MMI in various stages influence three types of NPD performance differently. Increased MMI in first three stages of NPD are strongly associated with lower NPD cost, and the impacts of MMI in business/market analysis and product testing stage are especially salient. Further, greater MMI in business/market analysis and product testing stage are also significantly associated with higher NPD speed, but the finding indicate no significant relationship between MMI in technology development and NPD speed, and the relationship between MMI in product commercialization and NPD speed is even negative and significant. In addition, the results indicate significant impacts of NPD cost and speed on product market performance.

Key words: marketing-manufacturing integration, stages of new product development, new product development performance, empirical study

中图分类号:

F270.7

孔婷, 孙林岩, 冯泰文. 营销-制造整合对新产品开发绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(9): 1-10.

Kong Ting, Sun Linyan, Feng Taiwen. Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration across new product development on performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(9): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] Sorescu AB, Spanjol J. Innovation's effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72 (2): 114-132. [2] Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20 (2): 343-378. [3] Kahn KB. Interdepartmental integration: A definition with implications for product development performance[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1996, 13 (2): 137-151. [4] Nakata C, Im S. Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: A group effectiveness perspective[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27 (4): 554-571. [5] 简兆权, 吴隆增, 董广茂. 基于知识管理的新产品开发影响因素实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010, 31 (6): 97-104.Jian Zhaoquan, Wu Longzeng, Dong Guangmao.A study of the impact factors of new product development based on the knowledge management[J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31 (6): 97-104. [6] 李志远, 赵树宽. 跨部门整合, 研发强度对新产品开发成功的影响——基于生物医药企业的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29 (1): 49-55.Li Zhiyuan, Zhao Shukuan.Inter-departmental integration, R&D intensity and new product development success: an empirical study of bio-pharm firms[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29 (1): 49-55. [7] 陈力, 宣国良. 跨功能知识整合对新产品开发绩效的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24 (6): 921-928.Chen Li, Xuan Guoliang. The influence of cross-functional knowledge integration on performance of new product development[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2006, 24 (6): 921-928. [8] Leenders MA, Wierenga B. The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19 (4): 305-317. [9] Griffin A, Hauser JR. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1996, 13 (3): 191-215. [10] Adler PS. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface[J]. Organization Science, 1995, 6 (2): 147-167. [11] Li S, Ragu-Nathan B, Ragu-Nathan T, et al. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance[J]. Omega, 2006, 34 (2): 107-124. [12] Tatikonda MV, Montoya-Weiss MM. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47 (1): 151-172. [13] Swink M, Song M. Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25 (1): 203-217. [14] Paiva EL. Manufacturing and marketing integration from a cumulative capabilities perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 126 (2): 379-386. [15] Henard DH, Szymanski DM. Why some new products are more successful than others[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38 (3): 362-375. [16] Olson EM, Walker Jr OC, Ruekerf RW, et al. Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2001, 18 (4): 258-271. [17] Song XM, Thieme RJ, Xie JH. The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998, 15 (4): 289-303. [18] Song M, Swink M. Marketing-manufacturing integration across stages of new product development: Effects on the success of high- and Low-innovativeness products[J]. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 2009, 56 (1): 31-44. [19] Urban GL, Hauser JR. Design and marketing of new products[M]. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993. [20] Olson EM, Walker Jr OC, Ruekert RW. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(1): 48-62. [21] Song M, Swink M. Marketing-manufacturing joint involvement across stages of new product development: Effects on the success of radical vs. incremental innovations[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2002: 1-36. [22] Koufteros X, Vonderembse M, Doll W. Concurrent engineering and its consequences[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19 (1): 97-115. [23] Brettel M, Heinemann F, Engelen A, et al. Cross-functional integration of R&D, marketing, and manufacturing in radical and incremental product innovations and its effects on project effectiveness and efficiency[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2011, 28 (2): 251-269. [24] Valle S, Avella L. Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2003, 6 (1): 32-47. [25] Garcia N, Sanzo MJ, Trespalacios JA. New product internal performance and market performance: Evidence from spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28 (11): 713-725. [26] Genin P, Lamouri S, Thomas A. Sales and operations planning optimisation. Supply Chain Optimisation. Springer, 2005: 191-204. [27] Calantone R, Droge C, Vickery S. Investigating the manufacturing-marketing interface in new product development: Does context affect the strength of relationships?[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20 (3): 273-287. [28] Turkulainen V, Ketokivi M. Cross-functional integration and performance: What are the real benefits?[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2012, 32 (4): 447-467. [29] Pisano GP, Wheelwright SC. The new logic of hi-tech R&D[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1995, 73 (5): 93-105. [30] Sawhney R, Piper C. Value creation through enriched marketing-operations interfaces: An empirical study in the printed circuit board industry[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20 (3): 259-272. [31] Wagner SM. Supplier traits for better customer firm innovation performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2010, 39 (7): 1139-1149. [32] Kessler EH, Chakrabarti AK. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21 (4): 1143-1191. [33] Boomsma A. Reporting analyses of covariance structures[J]. StructuralEquation Modeling, 2000, 7 (3): 461-483. [34] Chen J, Reilly RR, Lynn GS. The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: The moderating effects of uncertainty[J]. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 2005, 52 (2): 199-212. [35] Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 (5): 879-903. [36] Joshi AW, Sharma S. Customer knowledge development: Antecedents and impact on new product performance[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68 (4): 47-59. [37] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981: 39-50. [38] Ruekert RW, Walker OC, Jr. Marketing's interaction withother functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987, 51 (1): 1-19.

营销-制造整合对新产品开发绩效的影响研究

Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration across new product development on performance

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李艳妮徐兰香. 先前经验对新产品开发绩效的影响机制[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 142-150.
[2]	王媛，曾德明，文金艳. 跨领域技术融合对企业新产品开发绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8): 114-122.
[3]	汪建陶凌峰. 科技创新券的市场调节机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(1): 70-78.
[4]	齐晓梅楼润平成俊会. IT能力构建及其对企业和谐信息化的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(5): 145-154.
[5]	郑秀梅王海燕. “双创”驱动经济发展的效果评价研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 44-53.
[6]	周健明张新圣陈明. 资源拼凑、团队即兴与初创企业新产品开发绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(1): 52-60.
[7]	弋亚群谷盟刘怡马瑞. 动态能力、双元学习与新产品开发绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(1): 74-82.
[8]	齐丽云李腾飞郭亚楠. 企业社会责任对企业声誉影响的实证研究—基于战略选择的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(7): 117-127.
[9]	管婧婧周子杰马国斌. 浙江省县域科技创新活动的评估与空间聚集[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(10): 58-67.
[10]	刘云，杨芳娟，陈颖，刘文澜. 中国博士后科学基金绩效评估体系构建及实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(10): 138-149.
[11]	刘明明黄婷. 微信用户沟通与市场增长的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(1): 109-117.
[12]	孙鸿飞，倪嘉苒，武慧娟，周兰萍. 知识型员工心理资本与工作绩效关系实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(5): 60-69.
[13]	胡平石娟焦阳. 长三角信息服务业集群网络特征及其动态发展[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(2): 55-62.
[14]	唐贵瑶陈扬于冰洁魏立群. 战略人力资源管理与新产品开发绩效的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(11): 98-106.
[15]	占侃孙俊华. 江苏高校校企合作研究：基于社会网络分析的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(10): 146-152.