开放式创新研究的演化路径和热点领域分析—基于科学知识图谱视角

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 28-37.

开放式创新研究的演化路径和热点领域分析—基于科学知识图谱视角

夏恩君, 宋剑锋

北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2014-09-05 修回日期:2015-01-08 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-07-08
通讯作者: 宋剑锋
作者简介:夏恩君(1962-),男(汉),吉林松原人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向创新与创业管理。
宋剑锋(1986-),男(汉),山东淄博人,博士生,研究方向创新与创业管理。
基金资助:
国家自然基金面上项目(71172170):企业开放式创新网络社区演化研究(2012-2015)。

An analysis on the evolution path and hot topics of open innovation based on the view of scientific knowledge map

Xia Enjun, Song Jianfeng

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2014-09-05 Revised:2015-01-08 Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以Web of Science数据库中收录的开放式创新文献为研究对象, 借助Citespace II软件进行知识图谱分析, 分别制作了时空分布、文献共引和关键词共现知识图谱, 进而探究了开放式创新研究的分布状况、变化趋势和热点领域。研究表明:(1)英美两国学者引领了开放式创新研究, 我国学者在该领域的研究处于稳步提升阶段, 但能够密切跟踪国际前沿;(2)开放式创新研究的发展趋势是研究对象日趋多样化、实证研究取代案例研究成为主要研究方法以及基于网络社区的创新交互逐步取代企业实体之间的技术交易和合作研发成为研究主流;(3)开放式创新研究的四个热点领域是开放式创新模式与企业绩效的关系、基于创新网络的研发合作和技术交易、开放式创新知识治理和用户参与的开放式创新实践应用。

关键词: 开放式创新, citespace II, 知识图谱, 演化路径, 热点

Abstract: Citespace II is used to do the knowledge map analysis to all the open innovation research literature collected in the Web of Science database, with which time and space distribution, co-cited reference and co-word knowledge maps are made to analyze the distribution, change trends and hop topics in the field of open innovation. The study results show that: (1) British and American scholars have led the open innovation research, and Chinese scholars' researches in this field are improving steadily, which can follow closely the international front; (2) there are three main developing trends in the open innovation research: the diversity of research objectives, empirical study is replacing case study as the main research methods and the innovation interaction through online communities is becoming the research mainstream replacing the technology trading and cooperative R&D between the enterprises offline; (3) the relationship between open innovation model and enterprises' performance, the R&D cooperation and technology transactions based on the innovation networks, knowledge governance of open innovation and the application of open innovation with users participation are four hot topics of the open innovation research.

Key words: open innovation, Citespace II, knowledge map, evolution path, hot topics

中图分类号:

G301

夏恩君, 宋剑锋. 开放式创新研究的演化路径和热点领域分析—基于科学知识图谱视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(7): 28-37.

Xia Enjun, Song Jianfeng. An analysis on the evolution path and hot topics of open innovation based on the view of scientific knowledge map[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(7): 28-37.

参考文献

[1] Chesbrough H W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M]. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2003. [2] Dahlander L, Gann D M. How open is innovation?[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(6): 699-709. [3] West J, Bogers M. Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 31(4): 814-831. [4] Perkmann M, Walsh K. University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007, 9(4): 259-280. [5] 王雎, 曾涛. 开放式创新: 基于价值创新的认知性框架[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011 (2): 114-125.Wang Ju, Zeng Tao. On open innovation: A cognitive framework based on value identification, creation and appropriation[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2011,14(2): 114-125. [6] 张峰. 开放式创新实证研究述评与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(5): 52-58.Zhang Feng. Open innovation empirical research review and future prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2012, 34(5): 52-58. [7] 陈超美. CiteSpaceⅡ: 科学文献中新趋势与新动态的识别与可视化[J]. 陈悦等译. 情报学报, 2009, 28(3): 401-421.Chen Chaomei. Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical information, 2009, 28(3): 401-421. [8] Grant R M, Baden‐Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances[J]. Journal of management studies, 2004, 41(1): 61-84. [9] Christensen J F, Olesen M H, Kjr J S. The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(10): 1533-1549. [10] Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150. [11] Lichtenthaler U. Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2008, 55(1): 148-157. [12] Lichtenthaler U. Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences[J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(4): 317-330. [13] Faraj S, Jarvenpaa S L, Majchrzak A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1224-1239. [14] Reed R, Storrud-Barnes S, Jessup L. How open innovation affects the drivers of competitive advantage: Trading the benefits of IP creation and ownership for free invention[J]. Management Decision, 2012, 50(1): 58-73. [15] Lee S M, Hwang T, Choi D. Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries[J]. Management Decision, 2012, 50(1): 147-162. [16] Keupp M M, Gassmann O. Determinants and archetype users of open innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(4): 331-341. [17] Leiponen A, Helfat C E. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(2): 224-236. [18] Lee S, Park G, Yoon B, et al. Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(2): 290-300. [19] Chen J, Chen Y, Vanhaverbeke W. The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(8): 362-373. [20] Huang F, Rice J. The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "Open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2009, 13(2): 201-220. [21] Ethiraj S K, Zhu D H. Performance effects of imitative entry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(8): 797-817. [22] Dittrich K, Duysters G. Networking as a means to strategy change: The case of open innovation in mobile telephony[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24(6): 510-521. [23] Fichter K. Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(4): 357-371. [24] Chesbrough H, Crowther A K. Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries[J]. R&D Management, 2006, 36(3): 229-236. [25] Chesbrough H. The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property[J]. California Management Review, 2003, 45(3): 33-58. [26] Alexy O, Criscuolo P, Salter A. Does IP sttrategy have to cripple open innovation?[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2009, 51(1): 71-77. [27] Lichtenthaler U, Lichtenthaler E. A Capability‐Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(8): 1315-1338. [28] Lichtenthaler U. Intellectual property and open innovation: An empirical analysis[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2010, 52(3): 372-391. [29] Laursen K. User-producer interaction as a driver of innovation: Costs and advantages in an open innovation model[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2011, 38(9): 713-723. [30] von Hippel E, Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science[J]. Organization Science, 2003, 14(2): 209-223. [31] Piller F T, Walcher D. Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development[J]. R&D Management, 2006, 36(3): 307-318. [32] Di Gangi P M, Wasko M. Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2009, 48(1): 303-312.