概念知识地图协同创作过程中的群体决策模型

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 127-134.

概念知识地图协同创作过程中的群体决策模型

岳芳¹, 顾新建¹, 郭剑锋², 曹玉华¹, 乐承毅⁴

1. 浙江大学现代制造工程研究所, 浙江杭州 310027;
2. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 北京 100190;
3. 浙江科技学院经济管理学院, 浙江杭州 310023;
4. 华东交通大学经济管理学院, 江西南昌 330013

收稿日期:2013-07-11 修回日期:2014-04-17 出版日期:2015-01-25 发布日期:2015-01-23
通讯作者: 郭剑锋(1976-), 男(汉), 山东夏津人, 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 副研究员, 研究方向:决策支持、知识管理、数据挖掘等, 通信作者, guojf@casipm.ac.cn.
作者简介:岳芳(1982-), 女(汉), 山西阳泉人, 讲师, 浙江大学, 博士研究生, 研究方向:知识管理、制造业信息化、工业工程;
顾新建(1956-), 男(汉), 浙江湖州人, 浙江大学, 教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向:知识管理、制造服务、大批量定制等;
曹玉华(1976-), 女(汉), 内蒙古赤峰人, 讲师, 浙江大学, 博士研究生, 研究方向:企业及产品生态效率评价等;
乐承毅(1982-), 男(汉), 江西抚州人, 华东交通大学, 讲师, 博士, 研究方向:知识管理、制造业信息化、工业工程.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目:智慧的低碳设计和制造一体化技术及系统研究(编号:51175463),2012-2015;国家自然科学基金资助项目:语义支撑下以原油市场为例的Web知识发现关键方法及实证研究(编号:71271200),2013-2016;国家科技支撑计划资助项目:面向外文科技知识组织体系的大规模语义计算关键技术研究(编号:2011BAH10B04),2011-2015;国家自然科学青年基金项目:企业知识与员工知识贡献度集成评价研究(编号:71301068),2014-2016.

Group decision-making model for collaborative building of the conceptual knowledge map

Yue Fang¹, Gu Xinjian¹, Guo Jianfeng², Cao Yuhua¹, Le Chengyi⁴

1. Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China;
2. Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China;
4. School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2013-07-11 Revised:2014-04-17 Online:2015-01-25 Published:2015-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 概念知识地图可以作为知识表达的基础,采用协同创作的方法可以很好地构建概念知识地图.本文介绍了概念知识地图的主体协同创作过程,建立了群体决策模型.根据有限理性理论,对主体决策能力和主体间的交流互动进行了分析.运用调查问卷的方法获取仿真参数,对某科研组织概念知识地图协同创作过程进行了仿真,验证了该模型的有效性.研究结果表明,要获得稳定的协作结果需要一定的时间;知识积累对协作具有正向促进作用;协作结果对主体的初始认知情况具有敏感性.本研究可为协同创作规则的制定和系统的设计提供参考.

关键词: 知识管理, 概念知识地图, 协同创作, 群体决策模型, 信息交流

Abstract: Conceptual knowledge map can be the basis of knowledge expression. A group of subjects can participate in the building of conceptual knowledge map in a collaborative way. Firstly, this paper presents the collaborative process, and proposes a group decision-making model. Based on the bounded rationality theory, the decision-making ability and interactive communication of the subjects are analyzed. Moreover, to verify the validity of this model, the questionnaire is used to obtain simulation data, and the corresponding simulation analysis is conducted to explore the collaborative process of building conceptual knowledge map in a scientific research organization. The results indicate that it takes some time to obtain a stable collaborative result; knowledge accumulation has a positive role in promoting collaboration; collaborative results are sensitive to subjects' initial cognition. Finally, this research can provide a basis for the design of collaborative rules and system.

Key words: knowledge management, conceptual knowledge map, collaboratively building, group decision-making model, interactive communicatio

中图分类号:

TP182

岳芳, 顾新建, 郭剑锋, 曹玉华, 乐承毅. 概念知识地图协同创作过程中的群体决策模型[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(1): 127-134.

Yue Fang, Gu Xinjian, Guo Jianfeng, Cao Yuhua, Le Chengyi. Group decision-making model for collaborative building of the conceptual knowledge map[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(1): 127-134.

参考文献

[1] 孙坦,刘峥.面向外文科技文献信息的知识组织体系建设思路[J].图书与情报,2013(1):2-7.Sun Tan, Liu Zheng.Methodology framework of knowledge organization system for scientific & technological literature[J].Library & Information,2013,1:2-7. [2] 林建科.基于知识地图的知识集成方法和系统研究[D].浙江大学,2012.Lin Jianke. Research on method and system of knowledge integration based on knowledge map[D]. Zhejiang University, 2012. [3] Cress U., Kimmerle J. A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis[J].International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2008, 3(2): 105-122. [4] Moskaliuk J., Kimmerle J., Cress U. Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2009,25(6):549-561. [5] 张薇薇,王昊,朱晓东.互联网用户协同创作与内容共享的活动系统研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2011, 4:27-37.Zhang Weiwei, Wang Hao, Zhu Xiaodong. Research on activity system of internet users' collaborative creation and content sharing[J].Journal of Library Science in China, 2011, 4:27-37. [6] 张原瑞.网络环境下复杂学习行为中交互协作学习研究[D].西北大学,2012.Zhang Yuanrui. The research on interactive and collaborative behavior of complex learning in network environment[D]. Northwest University,2012. [7] 徐积明.规划知识地图[J].软件世界,2005(1):88-89.Xu Jiming. Planning knowledge map[J]. Software World, 2005,1: 88-89. [8] Canas, A. J., Coffey, J. W., Carnot M. J., et al. A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support[R]. Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2003. [9] 廖宇峰.国外知识地图研究现状和展望[J].新世纪图书馆,2009(3):80-83.Liao Yufeng. Research status and development trend of knowledge map abroad[J]. New Century Library,2009,3: 80-83. [10] 胡卫群,盛立人,肖箭,杨明辉,蒋华松.选举几何学[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.Hu Weiqun, Sheng Liren, Xiao Jian, Yang Minghui, Jiang Huasong. Voting Geometry[M]. Beijing: Science Press,2011. [11] 邓汉慧,张子刚.西蒙的有限理性研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(6):37-41.Deng Hanhui, Zhang Zigang. Simon's bounded rationality behavior theory[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 2004,4(6): 37-41. [12] 安实,田季员.不完全信息和有限理性下研发投资优劣势研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(6): 49- 56.An Shi, Tian Jiyuan. The study of R&D investment's advantages and disadvantages based on the incomplete information and bounded rationality [J].Science Research Management, 2010, 31(6): 49-56. [13] 陈娟,芮明杰.高技术企业知识员工间的知识传播模型[J].研究与发展管理,2004,16(5): 46-52.Chen Juan, Rui Mingjie. A model for knowledge transmission among knowledge personnel in high-tech firms [J]. R&D Management, 2004, 16(5):46-52. [14] 刘素军.认知心理学机理下的个体知识整合与创新[D].郑州大学,2011.Liu Sujun. Under the mechanism of cognitive psychology knowledge integration and innovation of individual[D].Zhengzhou University,2011. [15] 潘安成,邹媛春.组织忘记、组织学习与企业动态能力[J].科研管理,2010,31(1):33-37.Pan Ancheng, Zou Yuanchun. Organizational unlearning, organizational learning, and dynamic capabilities for enterprises[J].Science Research Management,2010,31(1):33-37. [16] Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2):240-267.