企业国际化经营专利风险因素 —基于专利属性的实证研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 139-145.

企业国际化经营专利风险因素 —基于专利属性的实证研究

漆苏

同济大学知识产权学院, 上海 200092

收稿日期:2012-07-16 修回日期:2014-03-18 出版日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2014-11-21
作者简介:漆苏(1981-),女,湖北武汉人,同济大学知识产权学院博士后研究人员,研究方向:知识产权管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(编号:71303172,起止时间:2014-2017),教育部人文社会科学一般项目(编号:11YJA630224,起止时间:2012-2014),国家博士后基金项目(编号:2013M541550,起止时间:2013-2014)。

The patent risk to Chinese enterprises in international operations: An empirical research based on patent characteristics

Qi Su

Intellectual Property Institute, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2012-07-16 Revised:2014-03-18 Online:2014-11-25 Published:2014-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从专利属性的视角出发,分析企业未来遭遇海外专利侵权诉讼的风险因素。以专利授权为分割点,将专利属性划分为品质属性和价值属性,运用权利要求数量、后向引用和专利家族三个变量描述专利品质属性,运用专利权维持、专利授权后审查、向前引用、专利权交易和专利权融资担保等变量来描述价值属性,进而分析专利品质属性、专利价值属性与专利侵权诉讼的关联;以中国企业在美国市场的专利侵权涉案专利为对象开展实证研究。结果表明:专利未来发生侵权的可能性,不仅与专利授权时的品质属性相关,同时与授权后专利运行中形成的新的价值属性相关;上述属性上的差异,可以帮助企业识别出市场上高风险专利,进而预测企业未来发生专利侵权诉讼的可能性。研究成果对于中国企业国际化经营中实施专利清查和专利风险预警有积极作用。

关键词: 中国企业, 国际化经营, 专利风险, 品质属性, 价值属性

Abstract: This paper presents an empirical analysis of the determinants of patent litigation based on information from U.S. patent cases involved in Chinese enterprises. The author divided the patent characteristic into intrinsic trait, existed when a patent is born, and acquire trait, developed after a patent has issued. Three variables are used to describe intrinsic characteristics, claims, prior citations and family size. Patent maintenance, reexamination, forward citing, assignment, securitization and other variables are used to describe acquired characteristics and to analyze the relevance of patent intrinsic characteristics, patent acquired characteristics and patent infringement litigation. By using the U.S. patent cases involved Chinese enterprises, the relationship between patent characteristic and likelihood of the litigation is empirically analyzed. The result shows that the patents which end up in litigation have markedly difference in both intrinsic and acquired characteristics than patents that do not. On the other hand, such differences can provide additional indicia of likelihood of patent litigation, and help companies to identify the riskiest patents prior to the time of the litigation. The research has implications to the Chinese enterprises who want to extend the U.S market.

Key words: Chinese enterprises, international operation, patent risk, intrinsic characteristic, acquired characteristic

中图分类号:

G306.3

漆苏. 企业国际化经营专利风险因素 —基于专利属性的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11): 139-145.

Qi Su. The patent risk to Chinese enterprises in international operations: An empirical research based on patent characteristics[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(11): 139-145.

参考文献

[1] Gretchen Ann Bender. Uncertainty and unpredictability in patent litigation: The time is ripe for a consistent claim construction methodology[J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2001, 8: 175. [2] Mark A. Lemely. Rational ignorance of patent office[J]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4):1495. [3] Jean O. Lanjouw and Mark Schankerman. Characteristic of patent litigation: A window on competition[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, 32(1): 129-151. [4] John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller. The business method patent myth[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2003, 18 (4):989. [5] Katrin Cremers. Determinants of patent litigation in germany[R]. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-72, 2004. [6] 毛金生,谢小勇,刘淑华. 海外专利侵权诉讼[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社,2012. [7] 王承守,邓颖懋.美国专利诉讼攻防策略运用[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2006. [8] 张平. 产业利益的博弈—美国337调查[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2010. [9] 国家知识产权局保护协调司组织编写. 中国企业海外知识产权纠纷典型案例启示录[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2010. [10] John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemely, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey. Valuable patents[J]. Georgetown Law Journal, 2004, 92(1): 435. [11] Christopher A. Cotropia. The folly of early filing in patent law[J]. Hastings Law Journal, 1009, 61(1). [12] 朱雪忠, 漆苏. 美国专利改革法案内容及其影响评析[J].知识产权, 2011(9): 79-89. [13] Barry P.Global & Amy EL Schoenhard. Patent re-examination procedure as a litigation startegy[N]. IAM MAGAZINE, 2011. [14] Reexamination Information, U.S PAT. & TRADEMARK OFFICE[EB/OL], http://www.uspto.gov/patents/stats/Reexamination_Information.jsp, 登录日期:2012年6月6日. [15] Moore. Can David compete with Goliath in our patent model[R]. Working paper, 2003. [16] John R.Allison, Mark A. Lemely and J.H. Walker. Extreme value or trolls on top? The characteristics of the most litigated patents[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2009, 158(1): 38. [17] Xuan- Thao Nguyen. Collateralizing intellectual property[J]. Georgia Law Review, 2007, 42(1). [18] Kyle Tondo -Kramer. Increasing access to startup financing through IP securitization[J]. Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 2010, 27: 613. [19] http://info.usitc.gov/ouii/public/337inv.nsf/56ff5fbca63b069e 852565460078c0ae? SearchView.[EB/OL],最后检索日期:2012年6月10日. [20] http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/?db=pat[EB/OL], 最后检索日期:2012年6月15日. [21] http://www.google.com/googlebooks/uspto-patents-assignments.html#1980-2011[EB/OL], 最后检索日期:2012年6月6日. [22] Chiristina Lui. Navigating through the legal minefield of state and federal filing for perfecting security interests in intellectual property[J]. Santa Clara Law Review, 2011, 51(2):705.