组织学习与组织绩效关系的Meta分析—基于测量因素、情景因素的调节作用

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 117-125.

组织学习与组织绩效关系的Meta分析—基于测量因素、情景因素的调节作用

蒋建华^1,2, 刘程军¹, 蒋天颖³

1. 浙江工业大学经贸管理学院, 浙江杭州 310023;
2. 浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地"技术创新与企业国际化研究中心", 浙江杭州 310023;
3. 浙江万里学院商学院, 浙江宁波 315100

收稿日期:2012-12-17 修回日期:2014-01-10 出版日期:2014-08-25 发布日期:2014-08-21
作者简介:蒋建华（1962-），男，浙江海宁人，教授，硕士生导师。主要研究方向：创新管理与知识管理。
刘程军（1987-），男，湖南邵阳人，博士研究生。主要研究方向：创新管理。
蒋天颖（1976-），男，浙江诸暨人，博士，教授，硕士生导师，主要研究方向：创新管理与知识管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“复杂网络环境下中小企业集群创新生态系统：集聚结构与演化博弈”（71372001，2014-2017）；中国博士后科学基金面上项目“创新网络、知识溢出与传统制造业集群升级协同研究”（2012M521029，2012-2013）；浙江省社科规划重点课题“基于社会网络嵌入的中小企业技术创新动态演进机理研究”（12JCGL02Z，2012-2014）；浙江省自然科学面上项目，创新网络动态演化与传统制造业集群升级协同研究：基于知识溢出的视角（LY13G030025，2013-2016）。

The meta-analysis on the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance based on the moderating effect of measuring and situational factors

Jiang Jianhua^1,2, Liu Chengjun¹, Jiang Tianying³

1. College of Economy and Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
2. Research Center for Technological Innovation and Enterprise Internationalization, Zhejiang Provincial Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Science, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
3. Business School, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, China

Received:2012-12-17 Revised:2014-01-10 Online:2014-08-25 Published:2014-08-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 组织学习与组织绩效之间关系的研究结果存在一定的差异。在国内外关于组织学习与组织绩效之间关系研究文献基础上，将组织绩效划分为财务绩效和非财务绩效，然后利用元分析方法对组织学习与财务绩效、非财务绩效之间关系进行了定量的综合分析，研究结果表明其存在显著地相关关系（r_f=0.442；r_nf=0.483）。论文不仅进行了文献的同质性检验，还探讨了组织学习与财务绩效、非财务绩效的相互作用之间可能存在的测量因素、情景因素等调节因素，发现组织学习的测量条目和产业先进性水平显著地调节了他们之间的相关关系。

关键词: 组织学习, 组织绩效, Meta分析, 调节效应

Abstract: There is still no consensus as to the relationship of organizational learning and organizational performance. Based on the domestic and foreign research literature, the research of organizational performance is divided into financial performance and non-financial performance, and then by using the meta-analysis method, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis on the relationship between organizational learning and its financial performance as well as non-financial performance. The results have showed that the significant positive relationship between organizational learning and its financial performance as well as non-financial performance (rf = 0.442;rnf = 0.483). The paper then not only tests the homogeneity of these articles, but also explores some potential measuring and situational variables that may moderate relationship. It finds out that organizational learning measurement items and industrial advanced level significantly adjust the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance.

Key words: organizational learning, organizational performance, meta-analysis, moderate effect

中图分类号:

F272

蒋建华, 刘程军, 蒋天颖. 组织学习与组织绩效关系的Meta分析—基于测量因素、情景因素的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(8): 117-125.

Jiang Jianhua, Liu Chengjun, Jiang Tianying. The meta-analysis on the relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance based on the moderating effect of measuring and situational factors[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 117-125.

参考文献

[1] Li-An H.What affects organizational performance?:The linking of learning and knowledge management[J].Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2008, 108(9):1234-1254. [2] Victor J. G-M, Antonio J. V-J, Francisco J. L. The influence of CEO perceptions on the level of organizational learning: Single-loop and double-loop learning [J].International Journal of Manpower, 2009, 30(6):567-590. [3] 施瑞龙.组织学习、战略执行力与企业绩效研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009. [4] Chin-Yen L, Tsung-Hsien K. The mediate effect of learning and knowledge on organizational performance [J] Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2007, 107(7):1066-1083. [5] 杨建锋,王重鸣,李家贵.组织学习对组织绩效的影响机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(7):158-162. [6] 陈国权,王晓辉.组织学习与组织绩效:环境动态性的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1):52-59. [7] 蒋天颖,季伟伟,施放.制造业企业组织学习对组织绩效影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008, 26(5):1146-1151. [8] 王铁男,陈涛,贾榕霞.组织学习、战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(7):42-58. [9] Hult G.T.M, O.C Ferrell. Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: Construct and measurement [J].Journal of Business Research, 1997, 40: 97-111. [10] Baker W. E, Sinkula J. M.The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, 27(4): 411- 427. [11] 张韬,刘家凤,赵莉.绩效整合扩展模型市场导向对组织绩效作用机制研究、组织学习与组织创新的作用[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(9):26-29. [12] 陈国权.组织学习和学习型组织:概念、能力模型、测量及对绩效的影响[J].管理评论,2009(21):107-116. [13] 李正卫.动态环境条件下的组织学习与组织绩效[d].杭州:浙江大学,2003. [14] 蒋天颖,施放.企业组织学习维度结构的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2008(5):87-92. [15] 蒋天颖,王俊江.智力资本、组织学习与企业创新绩效的关系分析[J].科研管理, 2009, 30 (4) :44-50. [16] Qingmin H, Helmut K, Juergen M. How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China[J].Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6 (1):36-52. [17] Samuel K, Wah C, Kin H. C, Wendy W.Y.W.Charting intellectual capital performance of the gateway to China[J].Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2011(12):249-276. [18] Swee C.G, Catherine E, Tony K.Q. The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: A meta-analytic examination [J].The Learning Organization, 2012, 19(2):92-108. [19] 谢洪明.市场导向、组织学习与组织绩效的关系研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(4):518-524. [20] 刘俊英.组织学习、战略变革与组织绩效关系的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2010(10):53-59. [21] 李丹.企业组织学习、创业导向与绩效关系研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2007. [22] Susana P.L, José M.M.P, Camilo J.V.O. Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance[J].The Learning Organization, 2005,12(3):227-245. [23] Jyotsna B. Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage: An empirical analysis [J].The Learning Organization, 2006, 13(5): 416-433. [24] Ngoc T.P, Fredric W.S. Facilitators of organizational learning in design [J].The Learning Organization, 2006, 13(2):186-201. [25] Jo Rhodes, Peter L, Richard Y-Y.H, Shih-Chieh F. An integrative model of organizational learning and social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance [J].Journal of Workplace Learning, 2008, 20(4):245-258. [26] Víctor J. G-M, Fernando M-R, Nuria H-T. Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector [J].Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2008,21(2):188-212. [27] Víctor J.G-M, María M.J-B, Leopoldo G-G. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation [J].Journal of Business Research, 2012,65:1040-1050. [28] Marko K, Sascha K, Markus M, Mikko R.The role of personnel commitment to strategy implementation and organizational learning within the relationship between strategic planning and company performance[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2012,18(2):159-178. [29] 陈国权,郑红平.组织学习影响因素、学习能力与绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2005(2):48-61. [30] 彭说龙,谢洪明,陈春辉.环境变动、组织学习与组织绩效的关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2005(6):106-110. [31] 赵文红,周密,组织学习与企业绩效:创新导向的调节作用.第六届(2011)中国管理学年会—组织行为与人力资源管理分会场论文集. [32] 杜海东.社会资本和组织学习对绩效的影响-基于中国新创企业的实证研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2012(9):49-52. [33] 张翼,樊耘,赵菁.国外管理学研究中的元分析评介[J].外国经济与管理,2009,30(7):1-8. [34] 姚山季,王永贵,贾鹤.产品创新与企业绩效关系之Meta分析[J].科研管理,2009,30(4):58-64. [35] Brinckmann J,Grichnik D, Kapsa D. Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle ? a meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning performance relationship in small firms[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(1):24-40. [36] Shea-Van Fossen R.J, Rothstein H.R, Korn H.J. Thirty-five years of strategic planning and firm performance research: a meta-analysis[J].academy of Management Proceedings,2006,(8):1-6. [37] Deseminian R, Laird N. Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials[J].Controlled Clinical Trials,1986,7:133-188. [38] 富振英.Meta-Analysis研究资料的统计分析方法(一)[J].药物流行病学杂志,1994,3(4):220-222. [39] 林枫,徐金发,潘奇.企业创业导向与组织绩效关系的元分析[J].科研管理,2011,32(8):74-83. [40] Arthur Jr. W, Bennett Jr. W, Huffcutt A.I conducting Meta-Analysis is Using SAS [M].Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. [41] Nunnally J. C, Bernstein I. H. Psychometric Theory[M].Boston:McGraw-Hill,1994. [42] Szymanski D.M, Troy L.C, Bharadwaj S.G. Order of Entry and Business Performance: An Empirical Synthesis and Reexamination [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995,59 :17-33. [43] 蒋天颖.基于贝叶斯网络的组织创新影响机制研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(5):61-67.