基于知识编码化的专业服务业服务模块化对创新绩效的作用机理研究

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1-10.

• 论文 • 下一篇

基于知识编码化的专业服务业服务模块化对创新绩效的作用机理研究

魏江¹, 刘洋¹, 赵江琦²

1. 浙江大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310058;
2. 莱茵达置业股份有限公司, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2011-09-20 修回日期:2012-09-03 出版日期:2013-09-27 发布日期:2013-09-10
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目《经济结构转型、研发网络化情境下企业技术创新能力演化规律研究》(项目编号:71132007);国家自然科学基金青年项目《产业网络嵌入、公司创业与集群企业升级研究》(项目编号71202173)。

How Service Modularization Affects Innovation Performance in Professional Service Firms

Wei Jiang¹, Liu Yang¹, Zhao Jiangqi²

1. Management School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
2. Laiyinda Real Estate Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2011-09-20 Revised:2012-09-03 Online:2013-09-27 Published:2013-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国的专业服务业发展时间较短,但是发展速度很快,其原因在于服务模块化的普及。那么,模块化是如何帮助中国专业服务业提升创新绩效的?本文基于四个专业服务业企业的多案例探索性分析,把知识创造理论引入模块化理论中,提出了基于知识编码化的专业服务业服务模块化对创新绩效的作用机理模型。研究发现,专业服务业的服务模块化(模块自律性和界面标准型)是分别通过推动个人知识结构化和企业知识显性化来提高创新绩效(客户响应性)。这一结论解决了现存文献的分歧,为从知识管理视角研究模块化问题提供了思路。

关键词: 专业服务业, 创新绩效, 服务模块化, 知识编码化

Abstract: The professional service industry has been set up late but developed rapidly in China due to the popularization of the service modularization to the industry. Then, how has the modularization helped improve the performance of the professional service firms (PSFs) in China? This paper conducts a multiple-case explorative study to four professional service enterprises by introducing the knowledge creation theory into the modularization theory and proposes a function mechanism model of the professional service industry's service modularization on the innovation performance based on the knowledge codification. The study results indicate that the service modularization of PSFs (i.e. the modular self-discipline and the interface standardization) can improve the innovation performance through promotion of the individual knowledge structuring and the enterprise knowledge dominancy (the customer response). This conclusion has solved the discrepancies available in the existing literature and will provide a unique thinking to study the modularization from the perspective of the knowledge management.

Key words: professional service firms (PSFs), innovation performance, service modularization, knowledge codification

中图分类号:

F270

魏江, 刘洋, 赵江琦. 基于知识编码化的专业服务业服务模块化对创新绩效的作用机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(9): 1-10.

Wei Jiang, Liu Yang, Zhao Jiangqi. How Service Modularization Affects Innovation Performance in Professional Service Firms[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(9): 1-10.

参考文献

[1] Nordenflycht, A.v., What is a professional service firm? Towards a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010. 35(1): 155-174. [2] Reihlen, M. and B.A. Apel, Internationalization of professional service firms as learning -a constructivist approach[J]. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2007. 18(2): 140-151. [3] Wei, J., J.Q. Zhao, and Y. Liu. Towards a knowledge-based taxonomy for value creation patterns in professional service firms: Cases of law firms in People's Republic of China. in Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. 2010. Macao. [4] 魏江, 赵江琦, 邓爽, 基于模块化架构的金融服务创新模式研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009. 27(11): 1720-1728. [5] Baldwin, C.Y. and K.B. Clark, Managing in an age of modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997. 75(5): 84-93. [6] Henderson, R.M. and K.B. Clark, Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990. 35(1): 9 30. [7] Miozzo, M. and D. Grimshaw, Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK[J]. Research Policy, 2005. 34(9): 1419-1439. [8] Boisot, M.H., Markets and hierarchies in a cultural perspective[J]. Organization Studies, 1986. 7(2): 137-160. [9] Sanchez, R. and R.P. Collins, Competing-and learning-in modular markets[J]. Long Range Planning, 2001. 34(6): 645-667. [10] Stremersch, S., et al., Buying modular systems in technology-intensive markets[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2003. 40(3): 335-350. [11] 魏江, 刘洋, 赵江琦, 专业服务业中的知识管理研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社科版), 2011. 41(4): 110-118. [12] Tsui, A.S., S.S. Nifadkar, and A.Y. Ou, Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps and recommendations[J]. Journal of Managemnt, 2007. 33(3): 426-478. [13] Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989. 14(4): 532-550. [14] Yin, R.K., 案例研究:设计与方法[M]. Vol. 5. 2004, 重庆: 重庆大学出版社. [15] Garud, R. and A. Kumaraswamy, Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993. 14(Jul): 351 369. [16] Garud, R. and A. Kumaraswamy, Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995. 16(special): 93 109. [17] Sanchez, R., Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1999. 63(Special): 92 111. [18] Tassey, G., Standardization in Technology-Based Markets[J]. Research Policy, 2000. 29(4 5): 587 602. [19] Ulrich, K., The role of product architecture in the manufactureing firm[J]. Research Policy, 1995. 24(3): 419-440. [20] Mikkola, J.H., Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006. 23(2): 128-146. [21] Ethiraj, S.K. and D. Levinthal, Modularity and innovation in complex systems[J]. Management Science, 2004. 50(2): 159-173. [22] Ethiraj, S.K. and D. Levinthal, Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2004. 49(3): 404-437. [23] Alvesson, M., Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity[J]. Human Relations, 2001. 54(7): 863-886. [24] 魏江等. 知识密集型服务创新分类研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2008. 2006(supp.1): 195-201. [25] Empson, L., Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms[J]. Human Relations, 2001. 54(7): 839-862. [26] Gardner, H.K., N. Anand, and T. Morris, Chartering new territory: diversification, legitimacy, and practice area creation in professional service firms[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008. 29(8): 1101-1121. [27] Sorensen, C. and U. Lundh-Snis, Innovation through knowledge codification[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2001. 16(2): 83-97. [28] Kusunoki, K., I. Nonaka, and A. Nagata, Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings[J]. Organization Science, 1998. 9(6): 699-718. [29] Sanchez, R., Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organizational learning: new management processes for product creation[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000. 19(6): 610-629. [30] Maister, D.H., 专业服务公司的管理[M]. Vol. 4. 2009, 北京: 机械工业出版社. [31] Suddaby, R. and R. Greenwood, Colonizing knowledge: Commodification as a dynamic of jurisdictional expansion in professional service firms[J]. Human Relations, 2001. 54(7): 933-953. [32] Ofek, E. and M. Sarvary, Leveraging the customer base: Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management[J]. Management Science, 2001. 47(11): 1441-1456. [33] Nonaka, I., A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization Science, 1994: 14-37. [34] Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and A. Nagata, A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm[J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2000. 9(1): 1. [35] Nonaka, I. and G. von Krogh, Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory[J]. Organization Science, 2009. 20(3): 635-652. [36] 魏江, 刘洋, 应瑛, 商业模式内涵与研究框架建构[J]. 科研管理, 2012. 33(5): 107-114. [37] Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, 创造知识的企业:日美企业持续创新的动力[M]. Vol. 4. 2006, 北京: 知识产权出版社.

基于知识编码化的专业服务业服务模块化对创新绩效的作用机理研究

How Service Modularization Affects Innovation Performance in Professional Service Firms

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘微微金英哲毕克新. 多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 162-172.
[2]	马增林, 于璟婷, 王磊. 远程工作对远程员工创新绩效的双刃剑效应[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 173-182.
[3]	赵富强胡伟陈耘张秋红. 整合共享型人力资源实践与个体创新绩效——知识交换与目标导向的作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 183-192.
[4]	肖艳红张刚庞立君马晶梅. 网络双重嵌入与数字创新搜寻战略匹配研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 134-143.
[5]	吴航陈劲. 网络伙伴多样化的影响因素与创新情景[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 137-143.
[6]	赵胜民于星慧. 创新失败对企业再创新绩效的影响：高管薪酬激励的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 183-192.
[7]	张秀峰胡贝贝陈伟张树静. FDI数量、质量与国家高新区创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 54-61.
[8]	刘欣萌李随成张彩林王祥. 伙伴关系对企业创新绩效的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 154-163.
[9]	齐丽云, 王佳威, 刘旸, 吕正纲. 高管团队异质性对企业绿色创新绩效影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4): 175-184.
[10]	王伟楠王凯严子淳. 区域高质量发展对“专精特新”中小企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 32-44.
[11]	王海花杜梅刘钊成. 高校知识网络对产学协同创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 116-126.
[12]	周楠, 杨竹. 制度距离与中国企业跨国并购创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 81-88.
[13]	李梓涵昕. 创新漏斗视角下开放性和独占性机制对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 99-108.
[14]	孟凡生徐野赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[15]	芮正云, 马喜芳. 反思性知识重构、企业即兴能力及其创新效应[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 176-184.