科技创新基地与平台建设支持政策关联性研究

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 55-62.

科技创新基地与平台建设支持政策关联性研究

陈芳, 穆荣平, 宋河发

中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,中国科学院创新发展研究中心,北京 100190

收稿日期:2012-03-01 修回日期:2012-09-28 出版日期:2013-01-27 发布日期:2013-01-19

The correlativity of support policy for science and technologyinnovation infrastructure and platforms

Chen Fang, Mu Rongping, Song Hefa

1. Institute of Policy and Management, CAS, Beijing 100190, China;
2. Center for Innovationand Development Research, CAS, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2012-03-01 Revised:2012-09-28 Online:2013-01-27 Published:2013-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2006年初,《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020)》(以下简称《规划纲要》)中提到加强科技基础条件平台建设,后续出台一系列支撑政策。本文运用政策分析方法和统计数据,系统分析《规划纲要》配套政策及其实施细则中科技创新基地与平台建设部分的政策关联性。研究表明,我国已经初步建成科技创新基地与平台政策体系,现有的大部分实施细则较好地支撑配套政策,但还存在部分实施细则与配套政策不一致,平台建设存在资源重复配置等问题。为增强我国创新基础能力,我国应尽快规范完善科技创新基地与平台建设相关边界与类型,归并部分职能相似的平台,具体细化实施细则,加强统筹平台投资建设和运营管理机制,充分发挥平台集聚高端创新资源能力。

关键词: 科技创新基地与平台, 政策关联性分析

Abstract: In the beginning of 2006, the Plan Outline of National Middle-Long Term Development on Science and Technology (2006-2020) is putting forward; it mentions that building Science and Technology Infrastructure and Platform (STIP) should be enhanced. And then Chinese government enacts a set of related supporting policies and performing regulations concerning with STIP. By using policy analysis method and statistical data, the correlativity between supporting policies and performing regulations concerning with STIP is systematically analyzed. The results show that there is a relatively sound policy system for STIP, and currently most performing regulations are able to better support the supporting polices. However, there are some inconsistent between supporting policies and performing regulations and the repeat resource allocation for some platforms building. In order to enhance Chinese innovation fundamental capacity, some advices are put forward, namely, to perfect the relevant boundary and the type of STIP as soon as possible, to merge some platforms with the similar functions, to refine performing regulations, to strengthen coordination mechanism between investment and operation of some platforms.

Key words: science and technology innovation infrastructure and platform, policy correlativity analysis

中图分类号:

陈芳, 穆荣平, 宋河发. 科技创新基地与平台建设支持政策关联性研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(1): 55-62.

Chen Fang, Mu Rongping, Song Hefa. The correlativity of support policy for science and technologyinnovation infrastructure and platforms[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(1): 55-62.

参考文献

[1] 罗珊. 国外科技基础条件平台建设的经验启示与借鉴[J]. 《科技管理研究》. 2009(8): 75-78.
[2] 顾海兵,李讯. 日本国立研究机构及其借鉴[J]. 《科学中国人》. 2005(1): 40-42.
[3] 连燕华、郑奕荣、于浩. 关于技术创新政策评估的探索-鼓励企业加大技术开发投入的财税优惠政策评估[J]. 《中国青年科技》. 2007(2): 4-8.
[4] 中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于实施《国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020 年)》若干配套政策的通知(国发
[2006] 6 号) . 2006年2月7日.http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2006-02/26/content_211553.htm
[5] Charles E. Lindblom. Policy Analysis [J]. The American Economic Review. 1958(3): 298-312.
[6] British Columbia. North East Coal Development, etc. 'A Benefit-Cost Analysis of the North East Coal Development: A Report' . Victoria: Queens Printer, 1982.
[7] Anthony Boardman, Aidan Vining and W. G. Waters. ' Costs and Benefits through Bureaucratic Lenses: Example of a Highway Project'[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1993. 12(3), 532-555.
[8] HLB Decision Economics Inc, ICF Consulting. 'Cost-Benefit Framework and Model for the Evaluation of Transit and Highway Investments: Final Report' . HLB Decision Economics Incorporated. 2002.
[9] Aidan R. Vining, Anthony E. Boardman. 'The choice of formal policy analysis methods in Canada'. In Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett M., et al. Policy analysis in Canada: the state of the art [M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2007.
[10] Anthony E. Boardman, David H. Greenberg, Aidan R. Vining, David L. Weimer. 'Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice 4nd'[M]. Prentice Hall. 2011.
[11] Crown Corporations Secretariat. 'Multiple Account Evaluation Guidelines' Victoria, BC: Province of British Columbia. 1993.
[12] Anne Davey, David Olson and Jyrki Wallenius. 'The Process of Multiattribute Decision Making: A Case Study of Selecting Applicants for a Ph. D. Program'[J]. European Journal of Operational Research. 1994. 72(3), 469-484.
[13] Ministry of Transportation. 'Highway 99 Alternative Routes Analysis Vancouver to Squamish and Corridor Improvement Analysis Squamish to Cache Creek (Draft)' . Vancouver, BC: Ministry of Transportation. 2001.
[14] Richard Schwindt, Aidan R. Vining and David Weimer. 'A Policy Analysis of the BC Salmon Fishery'[J]. Canadian Public Policy. 2003. 29(1), 73-93.
[15] Charles L. Ballard, Don Fullerton, John B. Shoven, and John Whalley, 'A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation' . University of Chicago Press, 1985.
[16] Willem Gunning, J. and M. A. Keyzer. Applied general equilibrium models for policy analysis. In Chenery, H. B., T. N. Srinivasan, et al. Handbook of development economics [M]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1995
[17] Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, etal. 'A review and assessment of land-use change models: Dynamics of space, time and human choice ' . UFS Technicla Report NE-297. 2002.
[18] Narayanan, B. G., T. W. Hertel, et al. 'Disaggregated data and trade policy analysis: The value of linking partial and general equilibrium models'[J]. Economic Modelling. 2010(3): 755-766.