组织冗余视角下的IT投资与企业绩效

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 139-147.

组织冗余视角下的IT投资与企业绩效

陈媛媛^1,2, 齐中英¹

1. 哈尔滨工业大学管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
2. 黑龙江大学信息管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2009-11-06 修回日期:2010-12-29 出版日期:2011-11-27 发布日期:2011-11-22
作者简介:陈媛媛(1982-),女(汉),山东省莱州人,哈尔滨工业大学管理学院在读博士,黑龙江大学信息管理学院,讲师。研究方向:创新管理,电子商务。
齐中英(1957-),男(汉), 黑龙江省哈尔滨人,哈尔滨工业大学管理学院教授,博导。研究方向:能源经济,创新与组织变革。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"能源产业与区域经济的耦合协调发展机制研究",批准号70873028,2009.01-2011.12。

IT investment and firm performance in the perspective of organizational slack

Chen Yuanyuan^1,2, Qi Zhongying¹

1. School of Management, HIT, Harbin 150001,China;
2. School of Information and Management, HLJU, Harbin 150080,China

Received:2009-11-06 Revised:2010-12-29 Online:2011-11-27 Published:2011-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 企业IT投资过程中,组织冗余究竟发生了怎样的变化？组织冗余与企业绩效之间存在着怎样的关系？文章对此进行理论研究,分析并假设IT投资的不同时期,企业未吸收冗余和已吸收冗余的水平发生变化,并与企业绩效之间呈相关关系。然后利用中国制造行业196家上市公司1994-2008年度的财务数据进行实证检验,发现六个假设中五个得到证实:IT投资初期企业未吸收冗余水平较高,未吸收冗余与企业绩效正相关,已吸收冗余与企业绩效负相关;IT磨合期企业已吸收冗余水平较高,未吸收冗余与企业绩效正相关。研究结果揭示了组织冗余作为IT投资与企业绩效之间的中介变量,能够反映IT对企业内部运作的影响。

关键词: IT投资, 企业绩效, 生产率悖论, 未吸收冗余, 已吸收冗余

Abstract: How does organizational slack change? What is the relationship between organizational slack and firm performance in the different stages of IT investment? The variety of unabsorbed slack and absorbed slack during the process of IT investment, and the correlation between organizational slack and firm performance are analyzed. The hypotheses are tested using finance data in the period of 1994-2008 from 196 manufacturing listed companies in China. Five of six hypotheses are confirmed. There is higher unabsorbed slack in the early stage of IT investment, and there is higher absorbed slack in the run-in stage of IT investment. The correlation between unabsorbed slack and firm performance is positive in the process of IT investment. In contrast, absorbed slack presents a negative correlation with the firm performance. The results indicate that organizational slack is the medial variable between IT investment and firm performance. It reflects the affection of IT on the management.

Key words: IT investment, firm performance, productivity paradox, unabsorbed slack, absorbed slack

中图分类号:

F270.3

陈媛媛, 齐中英. 组织冗余视角下的IT投资与企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(11): 139-147.

Chen Yuanyuan, Qi Zhongying. IT investment and firm performance in the perspective of organizational slack[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(11): 139-147.

参考文献

[1] Brynjolfsson E. The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology: Review and Assessment[J]. Communications of ACM, 1993, 36(12): 67- 77. [2] 方润生,王长林.组织理论研究综述[J].中原工学院学报,2008(6):13-18. [3] Roach S S. Service under Siege--the Restructuring Imperative[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1991, 69(5): 82-92. [4] Dehning B, Dow K E, Stratopoulos T. Information Technology and Organizational Slack[J]. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2004, 5(1): 51-63. [5] Cyert R M, Martch J G. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1963. [6] Bourgeois L J. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack [J]. Academy of Management review, 1981, (6):29-39. [7] Wernerfelt B. A Resource-Based View of the Firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180. [8] Nhoria N, Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? [J]. Academy of management Journal, 1996, 39(5): 1245-1264. [9] Baker T, Nelson R E. Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50: 329-366. [10] George G. Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48: 661-676. [11] Lin W T, Cheng K Y, and Liu Y S. Organizational Slack and Firm Internationalization: A Longitudinal Study of High-Technology Firms[J]. Journal of World Business, 2009, 44(4): 397-406. [12] Fama E F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88(2): 288-307. [13] Lewin A Y, Schiff M. The Impact of People on Budgets[J]. Accounting Review, 1970, XLV(2): 259-268. [14] Jensen M C, Mecking W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1970, 3: 305-360. [15] Bourgeois L J, Singh J V. Organizational Slack and Political Behavior among Top Management Teams[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1983, 43-47. [16] Singh J V. Performance, Slack, and Risk taking in organizational decision making[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29: 562-585. [17] Sharfman M P, Wolf G, Chase R B, et al. Antecedents of Organizational Slack[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13 (4): 601-604. [18] Solow R M. We'd better watch out . New York Times Book Review, 1987.7.12. [19] Curley K F, Pyburn P J. Intellectual Technologies: The Key to Improving White Collar Productivity[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1982, 24: 31-39. [20] Scherer F M. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance[M]. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1980. [21] 梁樑, 周垂日.企业中的信息技术生产率悖论[J].中国工业经济,2004(3):37-42. [22] 李怡文.组织在采纳信息技术前后的行为影响因素比较研究 .上海:同济大学经济与管理学院,2006. [23] Kwon T H, Zmud R W. Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research[M]. New York, Boland R J, Hirshheim R A: 1987. [24] Daniel F, Lohrke F T, Fornaciari C J, et al.. Slack Resources and Firm Performance: a Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Business Resarch, 2004, 57: 565-574. [25] Wiseman R, Bromiley P. Towards a Model of Risk in Declining Organizations: an Empirical Examination of Risk, Performance and Decline[J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7: 524-543. [26] Keegan A, Turner J R. The Management of Innovation in Project-Based Firms[J]. Long Range Plan, 2002, 35(4): 367-388. [27] Davenport T H. Business Process Reengineering: Its Past, Present, and Possible Future[J]. Harvard Business Review, 73(11): 59 70. [28] 林丹明,梁强.我国制造企业的信息技术投资效果——结合行业因素的分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2007(12):35-40. [29] 王立彦,张继东.ERP系统实施与公司业绩增长之关系-基于中国上市公司数据的实证分析[J].管理世界,2007(3):116-121. [30] 汪淼军,张维迎,周黎安.企业信息化投资的绩效及其影响因素:基于浙江企业的经验数据[J].中国社会科学,2007(6):81-93. [31] 李治堂.基于互补性理论的信息技术投资绩效研究[J].科研管理,2009,30(1):8-14.