科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 150-156,164.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

NIH院内研究所和洛克菲勒大学科研产出对比分析

杨凌春, 周辉, 蔡晖, 廖日坤, 张琰   

  1. 北京大学科学研究部,北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-04 修回日期:2011-02-11 出版日期:2011-06-27 发布日期:2011-06-14
  • 作者简介:杨凌春(1979-),女(汉),浙江人,助理研究员,研究方向为科技管理。周 辉(1968-),男(汉),湖南人,研究员,研究方向为科技管理。蔡 晖(1969-),女(汉),陕西人,副研究员,研究方向为科技管理。廖日坤(1981-),男(汉),广州人,助理研究员,研究方向为科技管理。张 琰(1980-),男(汉),山东人,助理研究员,研究方向为科技管理。

The comparison of the research performance between NIH intramural institutesand Rockefeller University

Yang Lingchun, Zhou Hui, Cai Hui, Liao Rikun, Zhang Yan   

  1. Office of Scientific Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2011-01-04 Revised:2011-02-11 Online:2011-06-27 Published:2011-06-14

PDF

4137

摘要： 本文对美国国立卫生研究院下属院内研究所的投入产出进行分析,选取同样专注于生物医学领域、以研究为主的洛克菲勒大学作为参比对象。对比方面包括两所机构的规模、经费、文章数目、诺贝尔奖以及院士得主情况。分析表明:科研的投入多,不能保证效果好。科技体制包括经费资助体系对科研产出起着关键作用。稳定支持和竞争相结合的科研投入,产出效果更好;通过Peer Review的竞争性项目的计划更完善,产出更好;科研队伍越精干,投入产出比越高。

关键词: NIH院内研究所, 洛克菲勒大学, 科研体制, 科研产出

Abstract: The research performance of NIH intramural institutes is compared with that of Rockefeller University, which is also focused on the biomedical area. The comparison includes institution size, research funding, the number of papers published in Science/Nature/Cell, the number of Nobel Prize winners, and the number of members in National Academy of Sciences between two organizations. The analysis shows that the quantities of funding can not grantee the quality of scientific research. The scientific research system, not funding itself, decides the research performance. The combination of competing and non-competing funds and the high quality research team can bring up better performance. Also the competing projects under the peer review are more effective.

Key words: NIH intramural institute, Rockefeller University, scientific research system, performance

中图分类号: