科研管理

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

新兴市场国家标准化与创新互动赶超模式及路径研究:以印度、南非为例

詹爱岚1,2,3   

  1. 1. 浙江工业大学 中国中小企业研究院,浙江 杭州310023;
    2. 浙江工业大学 法学院,浙江 杭州310023;
    3. 浙江省新型重点专业智库,浙江 杭州310023
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-22
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目:“新一代信息技术标准国际赶超战略及推进机制研究”(17BGL224)。

A study of the catch-up modes and paths in the interplay of standardization and innovation in emerging market countries:The case of India and South Africa

Zhan Ailan 1,2,3   

  1. 1. China Institute for SME, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
    2.  Law School, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
    3. Zhejiang Provincial New Key Professional Think Tank, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China
  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-22

摘要: 随着新兴市场国家在国际经贸、政治和科技领域扮演着越来越重要的角色,以标准的形式参与全球创新竞争的实践引发了国际社会的关注。印度和南非的标准与创新互动赶超实践,揭示了不同类型标准下的不同创新模式及各自不同的赶超路径。这为包括中国在内的新兴市场国家提升创新与标准化能力,理解和参与全球价值链的分工与治理提供了理论支撑和有益的借鉴。在实证分析印度和南非的标准化与创新互动赶超案例的基础上,总结了印度疫苗业最低质量安全标准、南非酒业的品类削减标准,以及医疗信息业的兼容及接口标准,分别通过证明、规模和协调模式来推动创新。在互动赶超路径上,印度疫苗业在识别出发展中国家基础疫苗短缺这一机会的基础上,将国际采购视作技术学习和创新的需求工具,并通过标准化将国际采购标准内化成国家产业政策;南非酒业是通过削减品种、科学种植、现代工艺酿造、严格酒标管理;而南非医疗信息业则是通过创造一个吸引子,构建一套自适应系统的层级结构型标准体系,并利用网关来克服基础设施的异构性。研究发现,在标准化与创新的互动赶超过程中,政府、企业、科研机构、行业协会等各主体扮演着不同,且协同的角色;协同之外,政府和行业协会的合作支撑尤为重要;企业的创新战略重点,取决于标准化在互动创新中的机制定位。

关键词: 新兴市场, 标准化, 创新, 赶超

Abstract: With the emerging market countries have playing an increasingly important role in the international trade, economics, politics, science and technology areas, the practices of participating in the global innovation competition by means of standardization have attracted international attentions. The cases of the interplay between standardization and innovation in India and South Africa reveal different innovation modes, different catch-up paths under different type of standards. The practices of India and South Africa provide the theoretical supports and useful references for the emerging market countries, including China, to enhance their capability of innovation and standardization, understanding and participating in the division and governance of the global value chain (GVC). Based on the empirical and comparative analysis of the catch-up cases of the interplay of standardization and innovation between India and South Africa, the minimum quality and safety standard of Indian vaccine industry, the variety reduction standard of South African wine industry, and the compatibility and interface standard of medical information system industry are investigated, respectively, in promote innovation by the mechanism of proving, scaling or coordinating mode.As regards to the paths of catch-up, according to the investigation, the vaccine industry of India, based on recognizing the opportunity to address the shortage of the basic vaccine in developing countries, building up an inducing mechanism and views the international procurement as a kind of demand tool for technology learning and innovation, and then tries to internalize the international procurement standard elaborately into its various national industrial policies through the standardization process. The wine industry of South Africa, however, achieves the scale innovation by reducing variety, together with the scientific planting, modern brewing, and strict wine label management. The medical information system industry of South Africa, nevertheless, realizes the innovation catch-up by creating an attractor, synergistically building up an adaptive and hierarchical structural standard system and overcoming the heterogeneity of the infrastructure by using a critical gateway. It concludes that in the interactive process between standardization and innovation, the government, local companies, scientific research institutions, industry associations and other national actors play their different but synergistic roles. Among them, the roles of the government and the technology/industry support organization, such as the industry associations, are highlighted, as they complement the relatively weak technological capabilities of other actors. The government, on one hand, serves as a coordinator and facilitator of standardization, that include actively pulling out the diverse interests of national stakeholders to shape the direction of technical development and improve the relevance and technical quality of the national standards. The industry association, on the other hand, in the absence of competency of the traditional technology suppliers, as an intermediary between technology supply and demand, by reducing the diffusion gap on the firm and producer’s side, play a substantial role, more likely to increase the technology adoption. What is more important is that the cooperation between the government and industry associations. Finally, it suggests that the strategic focus of innovation, to some extent largely depends on how a company positioning the mechanism of standardization in the interactive innovation.

Key words: emerging market, standardization, innovation, catch-up