科研管理

• 论文 •    下一篇

研发联合体:基于交易成本和资源基础理论视角

张玉臣,王芳杰   

  1. 同济大学经管学院,上海200082
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-22
  • 通讯作者: 王芳杰

R&D cooperation: A perspective based on transaction cost and resource-based theory

Zhang Yuchen, Wang Fangjie   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200082, China
  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-22

摘要: 文章通过研读合作研发领域代表性理论和实证研究文献,以合作研发建立过程为脉络,以交易成本理论、资源基础理论为阐述基础,梳理了合作研发领域的整体研究框架:对合作研发起源及其主要类型进行了系统的阐述;基于资源基础理论、交易成本理论和组织学习理论归结了合作研发的六种主要动机和获取竞争优势(利润)这一根本动机;从资源共同力量(collective strengthen) 和组织间冲突(inter-firm conflict)两个视角分析合作伙伴的相关特征及对合作绩效的影响;探讨了合作研发的组织管理,包括合作研发的基本组织类型及特征,梳理了企业实现有效知识溢出的专有性机制。最后,提炼研究结论及后续研究方向,旨在为后续的研究提供一个整体切入点,为合作研发实践活动的组织和评价提供参考。

关键词: 合作研发, 合作研发动机, 伙伴选择, 组织形式, 专有性机制

Abstract: By studying the representative theoretical and empirical literature in the field of R&D cooperation, based on the theory of transaction cost and resource-based view, this article combines an overall research framework of this filed according to the cooperation process. We aim to provide a holistic entry point for subsequent empirical and theoretical research, and a reference for R&D cooperation practices. This article first elaborates the basic concepts of R&D cooperation including different definitions and types. Although a considerable body of work highlights the R&D cooperation, but studies have not reached a consensus definition of R&D cooperation (or R&D collaboration, R&D alliance, R&D partnership). R&D cooperation can be divided into different types from different lens, for example, the horizontal or verticalcollaboration. Recently, some researcher suggested a new way of classification, the collaboration with supplier or public academic institution are viewed as distinct kind of collaboration as they are generally at the first stage of the knowledge chain compared with the alliance with competitors and consumers. Second, six main types of cooperation motivation and the radical motivation of competence (profit) are sorted out from the perspective of transaction cost theory, resource-based view and organizational learning theory. Particularly we find the multi-faced nature of motivation in different types of collaboration. For instance, University-industry collaboration can be better explained by resource-based and organizational learning theory, because most of the firms aim to get access to the commentary resources and expand their knowledge base through the learning process, while collaboration with firms especially competitors are more likely aiming to weaken the level of competition. Third,regarding the R&D performance including its subjective criteria like satisfaction degree or objective criteria like stock price, profit or sales revenue of new product, we relate it with the partner selection factors and governance factors( organizational form and appropriation mechanism). The characteristics of the R&D partners are divided from the perspective of the partner’s attributes and the partner relationship in the collaboration, for example the cooperation history. The trajectories between partner characteristics and R&D performance are explained through the concepts of “collective strength” and “inter-firm conflicts” from resource-based view. Specifically, we find a more fundamental role of inter-organizational trust which we classified as one of the relation-based characteristics. Finally, the classification of organization forms is primarily based onHagedoorn’s study over strategic alliance in 1990 and is improvised through other relevant literature, In the R&D cooperation context, we suggest four different types organizational form according to the independent level of the participants. And we further identify four attributes (incentive, synergy behavior, opportunism risk, transaction cost) to explain the differences between those organization forms. Then, a proper form of cooperation is assumed to achieve high incentive and synergy behavior while maintaining a low transaction cost and opportunism risk at the same time. The appropriation mechanism includes the formal kind such as the patents and contracts, and also the informal kind such as the secrecy and lead time. To achieve effective knowledge spillover and provide incentive for participates’ R&D efforts, Firms should employ appropriate mechanism based on specific circumstances, for example, cooperation with competitors usually address more on lead time mechanism for quickly building competence in the following stage.

Key words: R&D cooperation, cooperation motivations, partner selection, organization form, proprietary mechanism