科研管理

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国制造企业的低端突破路径演化研究

苏敬勤,高昕   

  1. 大连理工大学管理与经济学部,辽宁 大连116024
  • 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 高昕
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目“新技术环境下的组织创新研究”(71632004,2017.01-2021.12);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“大数据与互联网条件下的技术创新模式:行为视角的研究”(15JJD630004,2015.07-2018.07)。

A research on Chinese manufacturing enterprises’ low-end breakthrough from the perspective of path evolution

Su Jingqin, Gao Xin   

  1. Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China
  • Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20

摘要: 经济全球化与信息化等新技术情境的纵深嵌入,拓展并延伸了后发国家企业的低端突破方向与路径。通过对国内外相关研究的梳理发现,当前分析多从宏观层面进行理论推演,识别出“低端锁定”的影响因素或低端突破的潜在路径,并辅以部分产业或代工企业的实证检验,但对于诠释后发情境下中国企业怎样摆脱被“俘获”、“锁定”于低端环节,缺乏对微观层面突破机理的深入系统探析。本研究未局限于全球价值链(GVC)情境下代工企业的低端突破研究范畴,而是从微观层面的简单产品和复杂产品两种不同产品类型的视角切入,对深度嵌入全球价值链的汽车零部件代表企业万向集团和作为机车行业国内价值链(NVC)中链主企业的中车大连机车车辆有限公司进行了纵贯式案例分析。研究发现,以简单产品和复杂产品为起点的两类企业,虽因不同嵌入情境下价值链治理结构与产品定位差异导致二者低端突破过程各有侧重,但均在“接受定义→合作定义→主动定义”的定义延伸演化规律下,通过向垂直链条与水平链条两个方向交替进行定位跃升,从而摆脱低附加值与低端技术的锁定风险。可以说,双重维度下的复合路径选择是中国制造企业实现低端突破的关键所在。本文的研究结论从机理层面析出企业实现低端突破的路径选择与演化规律,对于复杂转型情境下产品类型各异的后发国家制造企业更具普适性与解释力。

关键词: 简单产品, 复杂产品, 低端突破, 双重维度, 复合路径

Abstract: The new context formed by economic globalization and the emergence of new technologies has not only expanded but also extended the low-end breakthrough directions and paths of enterprises in “catch-up” countries. Based on the systematic review of relevant research at home and abroad, it can be found that the current analysis mostly make theoretical deduction from the macro level in order to answer how to climb the global value chain. Several researches identified the main influence factors and the potential climbing paths of low-end breakthrough, and the others carry out empirical test on several industries or Original Entrusted Manufacture (OEM) enterprises. However, these studies failed to systematically interpret that how do Chinese enterprises in the post-development situation get rid of being “captured” or “locked” in the low-end aspects from the micro level of breakthrough mechanism. This study is not limited to the low-end breakthrough of OEM enterprises in the global value chain (GVC), but from the perspective of two different product types: simple products and complex products at the micro level. This study conducts a longitudinal case study between Wanxiang Group which is a representative enterprise in the field of auto parts deeply embedded in GVC and China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation (CRRC) Dalian Co., Ltd. which is the main enterprise of locomotive industry’s national value chain (NVC), thus comparing the similarities and differences of low-end breakthrough process between enterprises started with simple products and complex products in different context. Finally, the research found that the simple product and the complex product enterprises have diverse emphasis on the low-end breakthrough process owing to the different embedded context which is reflected in the governance structure and target orientation of the global or national value chain , but they all conform to the rule of definition extension and evolution—“accepted definition→cooperation definition→active definition”, so that by alternating the position on both vertical chain and horizontal chain, the risk of being locked in the low value-added and low-end technology aspects is eliminated. Therefore, the compound path under the dual dimension is the key to the low-end breakthrough of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The research conclusion obtains the path selection and evolution rules of low-end breakthrough from the mechanism level, which is more universal and explanatory for “catch-up” countries’ manufacturing enterprises with different product types in complex transition context.

Key words: simple product, complex product, low-end breakthrough, dual dimension, compound paths