科研管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 76-85.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

政府R&D投入、环境规制与农业科技创新效率

赵丽娟1,2,张玉喜1,潘方卉2   

  1. 1哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨150001;
    2东北农业大学经济管理学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨150030
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-25 修回日期:2018-06-27 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 张玉喜
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目:“基于门槛模型的生猪市场整合测度、影响因素及政策效应研究”(71503036,2016.01-2018.12);国家社科基金项目:“高端装备制造业企业持续创新实现研究”(16BGL043,2016.06-2019.12);黑龙江省普通高等学校青年创新人才培养计划:“基于省际和省内双重视角的黑龙江省生猪市场整合研究”(UNPYSCT-2017029,2018.01-2020.12)。

Government R&D inputs, environmental regulation and efficiency of agricultural S&T innovation

Zhao Lijuan 1,2, Zhang Yuxi1, Pan Fanghui2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China; 
    2. College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2017-09-25 Revised:2018-06-27 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20

摘要: 环境规制、政府R&D投入是制约农业发展的两大难题,度量二者对农业科技创新效率的影响,对研究现代农业可持续发展具有重要意义。本文采用2004-2015年我国30个省、市、区的面板数据,使用超对数SFA模型,测算出30个省级的农业科技创新效率,再采用门槛面板数据模型,研究环境规制和政府R&D投入对我国农业科技创新效率的影响,及对二者最优强度区间进行分析。研究表明:在农业科技创新过程中,环境规制和政府R&D投入对农业科技创新效率提升具有正向影响,且二者对农业科技创新效率存在显著的门槛性。当环境规制强度低于门槛值0.617时,环境规制对农业科技创新具有显著的正向影响,影响系数0.798;当政府R&D投入强度高于门槛值0.109时,影响系数为0.194,政府R&D投入对创新效率促进作用持续增强。只有当环境规制和政府R&D投入处于合理区间时,环境规制政策才能引致政府R&D投入,具有“激励效应”,进而影响农业科技创新行为,产生创新补偿效应,实现农业科技创新效率的提升,促进农业经济的可持续发展。

关键词: 环境规制;政府R&, D投入;农业科技创新效率;门槛效应

Abstract: Environmental regulation and government R&D input are two difficult issues restricting the development of agriculture. Agricultural science and technology innovation has obvious externality, such as monopoly of R&D resources and information asymmetry which leads to the existence of “market failure”. Environmental regulation can effectively solve the market failure caused by science and technology innovation. The government works hard to realize the “win-win” between agricultural economic growth and environmental protection, of which the keys are to obtain the best intensity ranges of government R&D input and environmental regulation. The moderate environmental regulation has a leading-effect on government R&D investment and then produces the “compensation effect of innovation” to the agricultural science and technology innovation behavior. Thus, measuring the impact of environmental regulation and government R&D input on the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation is of great significance to study the sustainable development of modern agriculture. The paper has two research features. First, the paper considers simultaneously the effects of both environmental regulation and government R&D investment on the innovation efficiency of agricultural science and technology from the perspective of industry. Second, the super logarithm stochastic frontier approach is used to measure the efficiency of agricultural scientific and technological innovation, which is considered as the research object, and then the panel threshold model is applied to study the nonlinear effects of environmental regulation and government R&D on the efficiency of agricultural scientific and technological innovation to investigate the optimal ranges of environmental regulation and government R&D input. The structures of this paper are as follows: the first section is the introduction. The second section presents research design. The third section gives empirical analysis results. The main conclusions and policy implications are provided in section four.In this paper, 30 provincial panel data from 2004 to 2015 are used to measure the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation in China by using super-logarithmic SFA model. The results show that the government R&D investment and environmental regulation have significant effects on agricultural science and technology innovation at the 1% significant level, which indicates that the government R&D investment and environmental regulation have played important roles in promoting the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation. This is because that the government R&D investment has a leverage effect and the environmental regulation provides good production conditions and ecological environment for agricultural production, promoting the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation. Among the control variables, only the development level of agricultural productivity is not significant, the rest variables are significant, in which the abilities of infrastructure and innovation environment promoting the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation are much stronger than that of the human capital.Then, to play the role of environmental regulation and government R&D investment in promoting the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation in China, this paper uses the panel threshold model to test threshold effects of the two factors on the efficiency of agricultural innovation. Taking the government R&D input intensity and environmental regulation intensity as threshold variables, the threshold effects are further discussed to determine the optimal ranges of government R&D input intensity and environmental regulation intensity. The results show that the single threshold effect of government R&D investment, and the single, double and three threshold effect of environmental regulation are significant. The threshold effects on the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation are of great significance to improve the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation in China. The optimal interval of government R&D input intensity is above 0.11, and the influence coefficient is 0.194, which means the government R&D input can promote the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation continuously. The reason is that the private sector is unwilling to provide investment due to the greater externality and risk of the agricultural science and technology innovation, namely "market failure". The government acts as a powerful supporter for R&D, which needs to provide the necessary financial support for agricultural research and development. The excessive intensity of government R&D investment will also stimulate the investment in agricultural R&D resources and have a leverage effect, which will enable the government R&D funds to play the role of “accomplishing a great task with little effort by clever maneuvers”, and then improve the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation to maximize economic benefits. The optimal range of environmental regulation intensity is less than 0.62. Environmental regulation has a significant positive effect on the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation, and the influence coefficient is 0.798. The reason lies in the fact that in the aspect of controlling environmental pollution, the government has invested too much financial funds to improve the agricultural ecological environment leading to the agricultural scientific and technological innovation lack of sufficient fund motive force, and the efficiency of agricultural scientific and technological innovation reduced. Only when environmental regulation and government R&D input are in a reasonable range, can environmental regulation policy increase government R&D investment through “incentive effect”, affecting agricultural scientific and technological innovation behavior and producing “innovation compensation effect”, and can government effectively solve the dilemma of agriculture, improving the level of agricultural science and technology innovation, and promoting the sustainable development of agricultural economy.Therefore, in the environment of the environmental regulation, the government should play dominate role in the input of agricultural science and technology, and provide rich R&D funds and good innovation environment for agricultural scientific and technological innovation. First, the government should continue to expand the scale of government R&D investment so that it can reach the investment level of developed countries as far as possible.And it is necessary to prevent the low efficiency or inefficiency of government R&D investment by ensuring the intensity of government R&D input within a reasonable range. Second, in the aspect of environmental regulation, we should formulate feasible environmental regulation policies according to our national status. Neither increasing environmental costs blindly, nor ignoring the positive role played by environmental regulation policies is recommended. We should strengthen the depth and breadth of environmental regulation to promote the innovation of agricultural science and technology, and realize the “win-win” between agricultural economic development and environmental protection. Under the strict environmental regulation, adjusting the government R&D input intensity effectively and increasing the intensity of agricultural scientific and technological innovation greatly can promote the efficiency of agricultural scientific and technological innovation.

Key words: environmental regulation, government R&D input, agricultural technology innovation efficiency, threshold effect