科研管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1-11.

• 论文 •    下一篇

行业异质性、环境规制与工业技术创新

刘伟1,童健2,薛景3   

  1. 1东北财经大学管理科学与工程学院,辽宁 大连116025;
    2清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084;
    3东北财经大学经济学院,辽宁 大连116025
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21 修回日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘伟
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金项目(项目编号:15FJY013;起止时间:2015-2017);辽宁省教育厅科学研究项目(项目编号:LN2016YB006;起止时间:2016-2019)。

Industrial heterogeneity, environmental regulation and technological innovation in the industrial sector

Liu Wei1, Tong Jian2, Xue Jing3   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, Liaoning, China; 
    2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 
    3. School of Economics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2016-06-21 Revised:2017-03-16 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-05-20

摘要: 技术创新是协调环境规制与工业行业的产业绩效这对矛盾体的有效途径,学术界对环境规制与工业技术创新之间关系的观点存在分歧,需要在理论和经验上进一步证实。本文建立了环境规制与工业技术创新关系的理论模型,并采用2003-2012年间我国35个工业行业的面板数据,考虑异质性行业的环境治理动机差异,实证检验了环境规制对工业技术创新的影响。研究表明:环境规制对工业技术创新的影响趋势呈现“U”型曲线特征,即弱环境规制不利于工业技术创新,而当环境规制强度达到“U”型曲线拐点以后,环境规制会促进工业行业的技术创新。污染密集行业比清洁行业的“U”型拐点出现更晚,污染密集行业的技术创新对环境规制的反应更慢,目前两类行业的环境规制强度都处在曲线拐点的左侧。因此,我国应提高环境规制强度达到一个合理的区间,同时对于不同类型的工业行业采取差异化的环境规制政策,从而有效推动我国工业技术创新能力的提升。

关键词: 环境规制;工业行业;技术创新;&ldquo, U&rdquo, 型曲线;异质性企业

Abstract: Technological Innovation is an effective path to coordinate environmental regulation and industrial performance in industrial sector. The divergence exists about relation between environmental regulation and technological innovation, which need to be further testified in theoretical and empirical aspect. This paper constructs a mathematical model of environmental regulation and technological regulation in industrial sector based on different motivation of heterogeneous sector, and tests empirically the effect of environmental regulation on technological innovation using panel data of 35 industrial sectors from 2003 until 2012. The findings are that it is a “U” relationship between environmental regulation and technological innovation. That is to say, the weaker environmental regulation intensity will hinder technological innovation, and after the intensity reaches to the inflection point of “U” relationship, the environmental regulation will promote technological innovation. The inflection point of “U” relationship in pollution sector comes later than that of clean sector, and technological innovation of pollution sector responses slowly to environmental regulation. Now environmental regulation of the two sectors is staying on the left of inflection point. Therefore, the government should increase the intensity of environmental regulation appropriately, establish different environmental regulation policies towards different industrial sectors, and then promote technological innovation in industrial sector effectively.

Key words: environmental regulation, industrial sector, technological innovation, “U”-shaped curve, heterogeneous sector