企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构的实证研究—基于376家高技术企业的证据

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1-9.

• 论文 • 下一篇

企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构的实证研究—基于376家高技术企业的证据

陈力田

浙江工商大学工商管理学院, 浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2013-09-11 修回日期:2015-02-02 出版日期:2015-08-25 发布日期:2015-08-19
通讯作者: 陈力田
作者简介:陈力田(1987-),女(汉),安徽庐江人,浙江工商大学工商管理学院讲师,博士,研究方向为技术创新与战略管理。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(14YJC630012);浙江省自然科学基金, 项目编号为Q14G020010;浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题成果(项目编号:13NDJC046YB);浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划项目(项目编号:2013QN076);浙江省自然科学基金, 项目编号为LY13G030013。

An empirical research on adaptive reconfiguration of enterprise technological innovation capability: The evidence from 376 high-tech enterprises

Chen Litian

School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China

Received:2013-09-11 Revised:2015-02-02 Online:2015-08-25 Published:2015-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 转型经济情境下,企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构是学界和业界关注的焦点。本文针对现有研究缺乏技术创新能力重构及其边界条件实证研究的问题,结合动态能力和组织二元性等理论视角,基于376家高技术企业数据的实证分析,识别了高技术企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构方案(对创新绩效效用递增)。研究表明:"吸收能力→集成能力→原创能力"是一种优越的技术创新能力重构方案,且环境越动态,优越性越显著。该发现弥补了能力重构和技术创新领域研究不足,对转型背景下企业创新与发展具有一定实践启示。

关键词: 技术创新能力, 适应性重构, 环境动态性, 实证研究

Abstract: Under the context of economic transition, the environmental adaptive reconfigurationof the enterprise technological innovation capability becomes the focus issue in both academia and industry. In recent studies, an empirical study about enterprise technological innovation capability reconfiguration and its boundary condition is lacked. In order to fill this gap, this paper, based on the perspectives of dynamic capability and organizational ambidexterity, and by means of the data of 376 high-tech enterprises from China, identified the adaptive reconfiguration path of high-tech enterprise technological innovation capability, through which the innovation performance can be improved. The research result shows that "realized absorptive capacity→knowledge integration capability→knowledge creation capability" is a superior adaptive reconfiguration path of high-tech enterprise technological innovation capability. When the environment is more dynamic, its superiority is more obvious. This finding not only filled the gap on the field of capability reconfiguration and technological innovation, but also has managerial implication on the enterprises' innovation and development under the context of economic transition.

Key words: technological innovation capability, adaptive reconfiguration, environmental dynamism, empirical research

中图分类号:

270.7

陈力田. 企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构的实证研究—基于376家高技术企业的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 1-9.

Chen Litian. An empirical research on adaptive reconfiguration of enterprise technological innovation capability: The evidence from 376 high-tech enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(8): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] Verganti, R.Leveraging on systemic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects[J].R&D Management,1997,27(4):377-92. [2] Yam, R.C.M.,Esther,W.,Tang,P.Y.,& Lau,A.K.W.An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms:Some empirical findings in Beijing,China[J].Research Policy,2004,33(12):1123-1140. [3] 许庆瑞, 吴志岩,陈力田.转型经济中企业自主创新能力演化路径及驱动因素分析[J].管理世界,2013(4):64-77. Xu Qingrui,Wu Zhiyan,Chen Litian.Research on evolution path and drive factor of enterpriseindigenous innovation capability under transition economy context[J].Management World,2013(4):64-77. [4] 安东内利. 创新经济学:新技术与结构变迁[M].刘刚等译.北京:高等教育出版社,2006. Cristiano Antonelli.The economics of innovation:New technologies and structural change[M].Translated by Liu Gang,et al.Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006. [5] Mudambi, R.,& Swift,T.Knowing when to leap:Transitioning between explorative and exploitative R&D[J].Strategic Management Journal,2014,35(1):126-145. [6] 陈力田, 企业技术创新能力演进规律研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2012,10. Chen Litian,Rule of enterprises' innovation capability evolution[D].Doctoral Dissertation of Zhejiang University,2012,10. [7] Martine R.H.The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge:Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization[J].Academy of Management Journal 2010,53(5):989-1008. [8] Cantarello, S.,Martini,A.,& Nosella.,A.A multi-level model for organizational ambidexterity in the search phase of the innovation process[J].Creativity and Innovation Management,2012,21(1):28-48. [9] Langfred, C.W.The paradox of self-management:Individual and group autonomy in work groups[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2000,21(5):563-585. [10] Cohen, S.G.,& Bailey,D.E.What makes teams work:Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J].Journal of Management,1997,23(2):239-290. [11] Calighirou,Y.,I.Kastelli,& A.Tsakanikas.Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources:Complements or substitutes for innovative performance[J].Technovation,2004,24(1):29-39. [12] Cassiman, B.,Veugelers,R.In search of complementarity in innovation strategy:Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J].Management Science,2006,52(1):68-82. [13] Chesbrough,H.Open innovation:The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M].Harvard Business School Press,Boston,MA.,2003. [14] Lichtenthaler, U.& Ernst,H.Opening up the Innovation Process:The role of technology aggressiveness[J].R&D Management,2009,39(1):38-54. [15] Lichtenthaler, U.,Lichtenthaler,E.A capability-based framework for open innovation:Complementing absorptive capacity[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(8):1315-1338. [16] Reagans,R.,Zuckerman,E.W.,& McEvily,B.How to make the team:Social networks vs.demography as criteria for designing effective teams[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2004,49(1):101-133. [17] Cummings,J.N.Work groups,structural diversity,and knowledge sharing[J].Management Science,2004,50(2):352-364. [18] Rishikesha T.,Krishnan S.K.J.Innovation strategies in emerging markets:What can we learn from indian market leaders[J].ASCI Journal of Management,2011,41(1):21-45. [19] Forsman,H.Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises.A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors[J].Research Policy,2011,40(5):739-750. [20] Lichtenthaler, U.Absorptive capacity,environmental turbulence,and the complementarily of organizational learning process[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(4):822-845. [21] Lane,P.J.,Koka,B.R.,& Pathak,S.The reification of absorptive capacity:A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct[J].The Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4):833-863. [22] Iansiti,M.,& Clark,K.B.Integration and dynamic capability:Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,1994,3(3):557-605. [23] Smith,K.G.,Collins,C.J.,& Clark,K.D.Existing knowledge,knowledge creation capability,and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology Firms[J].Academy of Management Journal,2005,32(2):346-357. [24] Wang,C.L.,& P.K.Ahmed.Dynamic capabilities:A review and research agenda[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2007,9(1):9-31. [25] Fosfuri,A.,& Tribó,J.A.Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance[J].Mega,2008,36(2):173-187. [26] Zahra,S.A.,& George,G.Absorptive capacity:A review,reconceptualization and extension[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203. [27] Nonaka,I.,& Takeuchi,H.The knowledge creating company[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1995. [28] 张明,江旭,高山行.战略联盟中组织学习、知识创造与创新绩效的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):868-873. Zhang Ming,Jiang Xu,Gao Shanxing.An empirical investigation of organizational learning,knowledge creation and innovative performance in strategic alliances[J].Studies In Science Of Science,2008,26(4):868-873. [29] 张媛媛,张宗益.创新环境、创新能力与创新绩效的系统性研究:基于面板数据的经验分析[J].科技管理研究,2009,1(12):91-96. Zhang Yuanyuan,Zhang Zongyi.Systematic research on innovation environments,,innovation abilities and innovation performance[J].Science And Technology Management Research,2009,1(12):91-96. [30] 杨燕,高山行.创新驱动、自主性与创新绩效的关系实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(10):1568-1576. Yang Yan,Gao Shanxing.An empirical study on the relationships among innovation drivers,autonomy,and innovation performance[J].Studies In Science Of Science,2011,29(10):1568-1576. [31] Nadkarni S,Narayanan V K.Strategic schemas,strategic flexibility,and firm performance:The moderating role of industry clockspeed[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(3):243-270. [32] 马文聪,朱桂龙.环境动态性对技术创新与绩效关系的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2010,29(3):454-460. Ma Wencong,Zhu Guilong.Environmental dynamism as a moderator between the relationship of technical innovation and performance[J].Studies In Science Of Science,2010,29(3):454-460. [33] O'Reilly,C.A.,& Tushman,M.L.The ambidextrous organization[J].Harvard Business Review,2004,82(1):74-81. [34] Helfat,C.E.,& Peteraf,M.A.The dynamic resource-based view:Capability lifecycles[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(4):997-1010. [35] Jansen,J.P.R,Tempelaar,M.P.,Bosch,F.A.J.,& Volberda,H.W.Structural differentiation and ambidexterity:The mediating role of integration mechanisms[J].Organization Science,2009,20(4):797-811. [36] Davis, J.P.,Eisenhardt,K.M.,& Bingham,C.B.Optimal structure,market dynamism,and the strategy of simple rules[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2009,54(4):413-452. [37] Escribano, A.,Fosfuri,A.,& Tribo,J.A.Managing knowledge spillovers:The impact of absorptive capacity on innovation performance[J].Research Policy,2005,(1):194-235. [38] Lavie,D.Capability reconfiguration:An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change[J].Academy of Management Review,2006,31(1):153-174.

企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构的实证研究—基于376家高技术企业的证据

An empirical research on adaptive reconfiguration of enterprise technological innovation capability: The evidence from 376 high-tech enterprises

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	孟凡生徐野赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[2]	吴言波邵云飞. 联盟组合重构有利于合作创新绩效吗？[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 103-111.
[3]	张秀娥李梦莹. 创业激情对创业成功的作用机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 120-126.
[4]	唐孝文孙悦唐晓彬. 中国高端装备制造业技术创新能力评价研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 1-9.
[5]	任旭刘佳. 魅力型领导对项目团队内知识转移影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(6): 150-158.
[6]	张永云, 郭鹏利, 张生太. 失败学习与商业模式创新关系：知识管理与环境动态性的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11): 90-98.
[7]	梁阜李树文耿新. 基于企业生命周期的人力资本最优配置—资源转化的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(4): 239-249.
[8]	汪建陶凌峰. 科技创新券的市场调节机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(1): 70-78.
[9]	赵忠伟，李睿，朱冰洁. 组织柔性对中小型高科技企业成长影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7): 247-256.
[10]	齐晓梅楼润平成俊会. IT能力构建及其对企业和谐信息化的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(5): 145-154.
[11]	郑秀梅王海燕. “双创”驱动经济发展的效果评价研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 44-53.
[12]	李卫宁占靖宇吕源. 变革型领导行为、战略柔性与企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 94-103.
[13]	刘婷张梦明. 外方技术控制与中外合资企业外商独资化陷阱[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(11): 155-163.
[14]	郑小碧. 跨国创业导向、技术创新能力与天生全球化企业国际化绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10): 230-239.
[15]	郭惠玲许杭军董保宝郭朝阳. 垂直与水平网络对企业创新绩效的影响差异研究——基于CAS理论逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(7): 59-68.