科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1-10.

• 论文 •    下一篇

自主创新政策与机制—来自中国四个产业的实证

王刚1, 李显君2, 章博文2, 孟东晖2, 高歌2   

  1. 1. 天津大学管理与经济部, 天津 300073;
    2. 清华大学汽车工程系, 汽车安全与节能国家重点实验室, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-15 修回日期:2015-01-05 出版日期:2015-04-25 发布日期:2015-04-18
  • 作者简介:王刚(1966-),男(汉),吉林松原人,天津大学管理与经济学部,博士研究生,研究方向:技术创新。
    李显君(1967-),男(汉),吉林松原人,清华大学汽车工程系、汽车安全与节能国家重点实验室,副研、博士生导师,研究方向:创新战略、产业创新系统。
    章博文(1989-),男(汉),陕西西安人,清华大学汽车工程系,博士研究生,研究方向:创新模式。
    孟东晖(1991-),男(汉),河北沧州人,清华大学汽车工程系,博士研究生,研究方向:技术创新、吸收能力。
    高歌(1990-),女(汉),吉林长春人,清华大学汽车工程系,硕士研究生,研究方向:工艺创新。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国汽车产业创新系统补偿研究——理论构建与实证分析”(71172007,2012.01-2015.12)。

Innovation policies and mechanisms: Evidences from four industries in China

Wang Gang1, Li Xianjun2, Zhang Bowen2, Meng Donghui2, Gao Ge2   

  1. 1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300073, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2014-07-15 Revised:2015-01-05 Online:2015-04-25 Published:2015-04-18

摘要: 鉴于主流理论不能很好地解释中国产业规模大但创新能力低的现象,以及国内学术界对创新政策与机制缺乏整合研究的缺陷,本文基于产业创新系统视角,以建立理论为目标的案例研究方法,辅助以数理统计分析方法,建立自主创新政策与机制理论框架;选择中国汽车、家电、航天和计算机为案例研究产业,进行大样本数据调研,对所提出假设进行检验。研究发现:创新政策对创新有正向作用,其中政府采购政策的正向作用最大;创新政策对创新机制有正向作用,对激励机制的作用比对运行机制的作用更为显著;创新机制对创新有正向作用,且激励机制的作用大于运行机制,而物质激励大于非物质激励。

关键词: 创新政策, 机制, 产业创新系统, 案例研究

Abstract: The mainstream innovation theory cannot make reasonable explanations to the particular phenomenon that China's industries are large in scale but weak in innovation capabilities. Domestic academics pay little attention to integration in innovation policies and mechanisms. On this background, this research explores and establishes the theory of innovation policies and mechanisms based on the perspective of sectoral system of innovation by employing the method of multi-case study based on building a theory as the goal and byassisting with statistical analysis method. We select automobile, household appliances, aerospace and computer as case study industries, and collect large sample data to test hypotheses we built. Our findings show that: innovation policy has a positive effect on innovation, of which the government procurement policy has the largest positive impact on innovation; innovation policy has a positive effect on innovation mechanism, and this effect on incentive mechanism is more significant than on operational mechanism; and innovation mechanism also has a positive effect on innovation, and the role of incentive mechanism is more important than operational mechanism, while the impact of material incentive is larger than non-material incentive.

Key words: innovation policy, mechanism, sectoral system of innovation, multi-case study

中图分类号: