科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 54-62.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校科研团队创新能力绩效考核管理研究

冯海燕   

  1. 北京交通大学科技处, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-28 修回日期:2014-12-26 出版日期:2015-01-25 发布日期:2015-01-23
  • 作者简介:冯海燕(1972-), 女(汉), 内蒙古乌海市, 北京交通大学科技处(副处长、副研究员), 研究方向:科研管理、信息管理.

Research on performanceappraisal management of innovation ability of university scientific research team

Feng Haiyan   

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2014-03-28 Revised:2014-12-26 Online:2015-01-25 Published:2015-01-23

摘要: 在知识经济背景下,国家创新能力直接决定国家的经济发展水平,产业结构转型.而高校是国家创新能力水平的直接体现,也是国家创新能力的主要研究主体之一,因此,高校的创新能力水平很大程度上决定了国家创新水平.而目前我国高校的创新能力水平不一,并且对于团队创新绩效考核的方法没有形成统一的要求,往往是简单的根据学科带头人的水平,科研骨干人数,申请科研课题的数量和等级来作为考核的主要依据,对于高校创新能力的提升简单通过增加科研投资额度及高新招聘高端创新人才来提高.忽略了创新环境、创新气氛、创新沟通等方面的提升,没有根据创新团队的特点、创新团队环境进行有针对性的提升.本文将高等院校创新能力考核体系作为研究对象,通过对高校创新团队的特点及国内外管理方法相关文献的查阅,并对分析方法进行了适用性分析,选用PDCA循环法作为论文理论分析方法,论文结合PDCA循环法分析高校创新绩效考核管理存在的问题,进而对高校创新绩效考核及PDCA循环理论研究予以完善.并将应用PDCA循环法找到影响团队创新能力提升的主要因素,分析其产生的主要原因,进而针对主要原因提出创新能力提升的主要措施.论文选取北京某高校团队创新能力绩效考核管理进行实证研究,运用PDCA循环法对该高校科研创新绩效考核,PDCA循环找到该高校创新团队存在的主要问题,并运用因果图分析法进行进一步的剖析,找到创新团队创新绩效存在的主要原因并有针对性的提出改进措施.对于较为突出的问题进行第二次PDCA循环,对该文问题进行深入分析,找出其存在的内部主要原因,并提出改进措施.运用综合评价法对运用PDCA循环法前后进行创新能力水平评价,评价结果显示运用PDCA循环法后创新能力水平明显提升,通过检验可以看出运用PDCA循环方法进行创新绩效考核对于提升高校创新能力水平是有帮助的.最后,提出对于高校团队创新能力提升的建议与措施.根据文献及实践分析提出目前高校创新能力提升的四点措施,即:创新课题选择,人才培养,团队建设与环境建设.综上所述,本文提供了高校创新绩效考核管理的新方法,通过实证分析论证了该方法的有效性.由于全国高校创新侧重点不同,存在该方法考核时考虑不到的问题,因此还需要进行大量的实证分析进行量化分析,找出该方法在同类问题应用中存在问题,这是本论文的不足之处.

关键词: 高校科研团队, 创新能力, 绩效考核管理体系, PDCA循环

Abstract: In the background of knowledge economy, the national innovation ability directly determines the country's level of economic development, industrial structure transformation. Colleges and universities reflect directly the national innovation ability level, and they are one of the main research subjects of the national innovation capacity, so they largely determine the level of national innovation level. At present, the creative ability levels vary, and the methods for assessing the performance of team innovation has not met the unified requirements, while the assessment is mainly based on the level of the academic leaders, the number of the backbone of scientific research, number and grade of application for scientific research and the innovation ability of universities will be promoted simply by increasing the amount of investment research and the high level of recruiting innovative talents, ignoring promotion of the innovation environment, innovation climate, innovation communication, and failure to make targeted enhancement according to the characteristics of creative teams and the creative team environment.In this paper, the evaluation system of innovation ability of colleges and universities are taken as the research objects, and throughreferring to the literature related to the characteristic of university innovation team and management methods at home and abroad, analyzing the applicability of the analysis method, and selecting the PDCA method as the method of theoretical analysis, this paper analyzes the existing problems of university innovation performance appraisal management in combination with the PDCA method, and perfects the research on the innovation performance appraisal of university evaluation and the PDCA circulation theory. It also finds out the main factors influencing the lifting capability of team innovation by applying the PDCA circulation method, analyzes the reason of their coming into being, and puts forward the main measures to enhance the innovation capability.This paper conducts an empirical research on the innovation performance appraisal management of a university team in Beijing, evaluates the scientific research innovation performance of the colleges and universities by means of PDCA circulation, finds out the main problems of the University Innovation Team existed, makes a further analysis by using the analysis method of causality diagram, finds out the main reason for the existence of innovation team performance and proposes targeted improvement measures. For the more prominent problem,a second PDCA circulation is made for analyzing the problem, finding out the main reasons for its existence, and putting forward the measures of improvement. The comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the innovation ability level before and after the application of PDCA circulation method, and the evaluation results show that the innovation ability is improved obviously by using the PDCA circulation method, and it is helpful to enhance the university innovation capability levelby using the PDCA circulation method.Finally, this paper puts forward the suggestions and measures to enhance innovation capability of the university team. According to the analysis of the literature and practice, the paper puts forward four measures for improvement of the innovation ability of colleges and universities, namely the innovation topic selection, training of talents, team building and environment construction. In summary, this paper provides a new method of university innovation performance appraisal management, and demonstrates the validity of the method through the empirical analysis. Because of the different emphasis in innovation, some problems exist in the appraisal by using this method, therefore, a large number of empirical analysis is needed to carry on a quantitative analysis, so as to find out the problems existed in the application of the method in similar problems. This is the deficiency of this paper.

Key words: university scientific research team, innovative ability, performance appraisal management system, PDCA circulation

中图分类号: