市场化水平、教育程度和家族企业研发投资

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 44-50.

市场化水平、教育程度和家族企业研发投资

陈凌, 吴炳德

浙江大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2013-10-23 修回日期:2014-04-09 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-07-15
作者简介:陈凌（1966-），男（汉），浙江建德人，浙江大学管理学院副院长，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为家族企业和企业史。
吴炳德（1980-），男（汉），福建泉州人，浙江大学管理学院博士生，主要研究方向为家族企业、创业和创新。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（批准号：71272172；起止时间：2013.1-2016.12）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（批准号：13YJC630163；起止时间：2013.1-2015.12）；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（批准号：10YJA630233，起止时间：2012.1-2014.12）。

Marketization, education and family business’s R&D investment

Chen Ling, Wu Bingde

School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China

Received:2013-10-23 Revised:2014-04-09 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研发投资是决定创新能力的最重要因素，在转型经济体下，探讨家族控制这种最普遍又特殊的企业治理形式对研发投资的影响具有重要理论和现实意义。这个研究以社会情感财富理论为基础，假设家族企业研发投入的力度低于非家族企业；当市场化水平较高或负责人受教育程度较高时，家族企业研发投入的增幅低于非家族企业；但当两者同时较高时，家族企业研发投资的增幅大于非家族企业。基于全国工商联数据的实证分析支持了这些假设。

关键词: 家族企业, 市场化水平, 教育程度, 社会情感财富, 研发投入

Abstract: R&D investment is the most determinant element for innovational capability. The study of the impact of family control on R&D investment in transition economy has theoretical and realistic significance. The study, based on SEW perspective, supposes that family business invests less in R&D than non-family business and the increases of R&D investment in the family business is also less than non-family business in the case of the higher marketization level or higher education of CEO, but the increase of R&D investment is more for family business than for non-family business in the case of higher marketization level plus higher education. The empirical analysis based on ACFIC data supports these hypotheses.

Key words: family business, marketization level, education level, SEW, R&D investment

中图分类号:

F272.3

陈凌, 吴炳德. 市场化水平、教育程度和家族企业研发投资[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(7): 44-50.

Chen Ling, Wu Bingde. Marketization, education and family business’s R&D investment[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(7): 44-50.

参考文献

[1] Dosi, G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation [J]. Journal Of Economic Literature, 1988, 26(3): 1120-1171. [2] Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152. [3] 郝颖, 刘星. 市场化进程与上市公司R&D投资:基于产权特征视角 [J]. 科研管理, 2010(4): 81-90. [4] 国家统计局社会和科技统计司. 2007年全国工业企业创新调查统计资料 [M]. 中国统计出版社, 2008: 3. [5] 刘运国, 刘雯. 我国上市公司的高管任期与R&D支出 [J]. 管理世界, 2007(1): 128-136. [6] 宁静, 井润田. CEO特征、R&D强度以及外部环境关系的实证研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2009(5): 178-186. [7] 韦小柯. 高层管理团队特征与企业R&D投入关系研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2006(S2): 553-557. [8] 文芳, 胡玉明. 中国上市公司高管个人特征与R&D投资 [J]. 管理评论, 2009(11): 84-91,128. [9] 廖开容, 陈爽英. 制度环境对民营企业研发投人影响的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011(29): 1342-1348. [10] Chrisman, J. J., Patel, P. C. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4): 976-997. [11] Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Sharma, P. Defining the family business by behavior [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1999, 23(2): 19-40. [12] Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. Corporate ownership around the world [J]. The journal of finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-517. [13] 陈凌, 王昊. 家族涉入、政治联系与制度环境[J]. 管理世界, 2013(10): 130-141. [14] Schmid, T., Achleitner, A.-K., Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, C. Family firms and R&D behavior-new evidence from a large-scale survey [J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(1): 233-244. [15] 关勇军, 瞿旻. 基于深圳中小板的家族企业与创新投入关系的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(7): 38-43. [16] Block, J. H. R&d investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(2): 248-265. [17] James, H. S. Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm [J]. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1999, 6(1): 41-55. [18] Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D. Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability [J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 2006, 30(6): 731-746. [19] Chen, H. L., Hsu, W. T. Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment [J]. Family Business Review, 2009, 22(4): 347-362. [20] Munari, F., Oriani, R., Sobrero, M. The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of western european firms [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1093-1104. [21] Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., De Castro, J. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms [J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1): 653-707. [22] Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nú?ez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., Moyano-Fuentes, J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from spanish olive oil mills [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2007, 52(1): 106-137. [23] Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Campbell, J. T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., Sirmon, D. G. Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2013, [24] Luo, X. R., Chung, C.-N. Filling or abusing the institutional void? Ownership and management control of public family businesses in an emerging market [J]. Organization Science, 2013, 24(2): 591-613. [25] Peng, M. W., Jiang, Y. Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms [J]. Journal Of Management Studies, 2010, 47(2): 253-273. [26] Khanna, T., Palepu, K. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(4): 41-48. [27] 李茜, 张建君. 制度前因与高管特点:一个实证研究 [J]. 管理世界, 2010(10): 110-121. [28] Cyert, R. M., March, J. G. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs, 1963: [29] 樊纲, 王小鲁, 朱恒鹏. 中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告 [M]. 经济科学出版社, 2011. [30] 雷丁. 海外华人企业家的管理思想: 文化背景与风格 [M]. 三联书店上海分店, 1993. [31] Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research [J]. Family Business Review, 2012, 25(3): 258-279. [32] Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions [J]. Journal of business, 1986, 59(4): 251-278. [33] Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., Choice, R. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choic [J]. Science, 1981, 211(4481): 453-458. [34] Benartzi, S., Thaler, R. H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(1): 73-92. [35] Thaler, R. H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., Schwartz, A. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(2): 647-661. [36] 储小平, 李怀祖. 信任与家族企业的成长[J]. 管理世界, 2003(6): 98-104. [37] K nig, A., Kammerlander, N., Enders, A. The family innovator's dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms [J]. Academy of management Review, 2012, 38(3): 418-441. [38] De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Lichtenthaler, U. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions [J]. Family Business Review, 2013, 26(1): 10-31. [39] Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Litz, R. A. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2004, 28(4): 335-354. [40] 陈爽英, 井润田, 龙小宁, 邵云飞. 民营企业家社会关系资本对研发投资决策影响的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2010(1): 88-97.