众包竞赛模式下企业R&D创新水平策略博弈分析

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 111-120.

众包竞赛模式下企业R&D创新水平策略博弈分析

郝琳娜¹, 侯文华¹, 刘猛²

1. 南开大学商学院, 天津 300071;
2. 天津大学管理与经济学部, 天津 300072

收稿日期:2012-11-20 修回日期:2013-11-29 出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-04-25
作者简介:侯文华（1964-），男，河北邢台人。南开大学商学院教授、博士研究生导师。研究方向为服务外包、电子商务模式创新等
郝琳娜（1983-），女，河北衡水人，博士研究生，研究方向：电子商务模式创新
基金资助:
国家自然基金资助项目（71071080）

The game analysis of enterprises’ R&D innovation strategyunder crowdsourcing contest mode

Hao Linna¹, Hou Wenhua¹, Liu Meng²

1. School of business, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
2. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2012-11-20 Revised:2013-11-29 Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 企业R&D创新需要有效利用内外部创新资源，基于众包竞赛模式的企业R&D创新能够充分挖掘和激发大众的创新智慧，助力企业R&D创新，已受到企业界的广泛重视。考虑R&D创新模式溢出效应的不同情况下，针对企业创新模式及其投入策略选择，以及众包竞赛模式下企业间完全竞争和合作时的决策问题，建立了相应的博弈模型，分析了企业的决策对R&D创新水平的影响。研究表明：较仅依靠内部资源的R&D创新（A策略）收益，企业通过设置合理的奖金并结合内部创新和众包竞赛模式（B策略）是占优策略；B策略下，企业间处于完全竞争或合作的状态时，溢出效应的不同对众包竞赛模式创新能力的贡献度造成了影响；此外，企业收益、R&D创新水平、消费者剩余及社会福利均与众包竞赛模式的贡献度正相关。最后以宝洁公司采用B策略对R&D进行创新的案例验证了相关结论。

关键词: 众包竞赛, R&D创新, 溢出效应, 博弈分析

Abstract: The enterprises' R&D innovation require effective use of internal and external resources. As a new mode of innovation, crowdsourcing contest has drawn a widely public attention due to its full use of the public's intelligence for enterprises' R&D innovation. Considering the existence of spillover effects, we developed a game model to analyze the optimal innovation mode and investment policy of enterprises. When crowdsourcing contest is selected, we further discussed the corresponding decisions if the relationship between enterprises is competitive or cooperative, and analyzed the influence of these decisions on R&D innovation. The results showed that, when a reasonable bonus was set, the strategy that combining use of internal innovation and crowdsourcing contest innovation (B strategy) was better than that solely relying on the internal innovation (A strategy). Given B strategy, different spillover effects would affect the level of R&D innovation of crowdsourcing contest mode, under both competition and cooperation situation. Meanwhile, the contribution of the crowdsourcing contest was positively related to many factors, including enterprise income, the level of R&D innovation, consumer surplus and social welfare. Finally, a case of P&G Company is used to verify the corresponding conclusions of the paper.

Key words: crowdsourcing contest, R&D innovation, spillover effects, game analysis

中图分类号:

279.2

郝琳娜, 侯文华, 刘猛. 众包竞赛模式下企业R&D创新水平策略博弈分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(4): 111-120.

Hao Linna, Hou Wenhua, Liu Meng. The game analysis of enterprises’ R&D innovation strategyunder crowdsourcing contest mode[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(4): 111-120.

参考文献

[1] 刘卫民, 陈继祥.内生溢出与R&D竞争、合作的激励问题[J].管理工程学报, 2006, 20(3):1-5. [2] Czarnttzki D., Ebersberger B.and FierI A..The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance:empirical evidence from finland and germany[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2007, 22:1347-1366. [3] González X., Jaumandreu J.and PazóReviewed C.Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness[J].The RAND Journal of Economics, 2005, Vol.36, No.4 pp.930-950. [4] 赵丹, 王宗军.消费者剩余、技术许可选择与双边政府R&D补贴[J].科研管理, 2002, 33(2):88-96. [5] Estellés-Arolas, E.& González Ladrón-de-Guevara, F.Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition[J].Journal of Information Science, 2012, 38(2):189-200. [6] 侯文华, 郑海超.众包竞赛——一把开启集体智慧的钥匙[M].科学出版社, 2012. [7] DAspremont C, Jacquemin A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5):1133-1137. [8] Cassiman B., Veugelers R.R&D Cooperation and Spillovers:Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium[J].The American Economic Review, 2002, Vol.92, No.4 pp.1169-1184. [9] Piga C., Theotoky J.P.Endogenous R&D spillovers and locational choice[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2005, 35:127-139. [10] Miyagiwa K, Ohno Y.Uncertainty, spillovers, and cooperative R&D[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20:855-875. [11] Terwiesch, C., Xu, Y.Innovation contests, open innovation, andmultiagent problem solving[J].Management Sci, 2008, 54(9):1529-1543. [12] 张春辉, 陈继祥.考虑内生溢出与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J].中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3):26-32. [13] Chanal V, Caron-Fasan M.L.How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing:the Crowdspirit174;case[C]//Actes de la Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, Nice.2008:1-27 [14] Brabham D.Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving:An Introduction and Cases, Convergence[J].The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2008, 14(1):75-90. [15] Schenk E., Guittard, C.Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices[J].Journal of Innovation Economics., 2011, 7(1):93-107. [16] 杨育谋.宝洁:创新没有边界[J].市场研究, 2009(7):35-37. [17] Lakhani K R, Jeppesen L B, Lohse P A, et al.The Value of Openess in Scientific Problem Solving[M].Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 2007:07-50. [18] Brabham, D.C..Crowdsourced advertising:How we outperform Madison Avenue.Flow:A Critical Forum on Television and Media Culture[OL].2009, 9(10).Retrieved from http://flowtv.org/?p=3221.