基于多级视角模型的风能产业对比研究

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (7): 17-23.

基于多级视角模型的风能产业对比研究

李小芬¹, 冯海红², 王胜光²

1. 中国科学技术大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230026;
2. 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2011-10-25 修回日期:2012-04-23 出版日期:2013-07-27 发布日期:2013-07-23
作者简介:李小芬(1986-),女,河南焦作人,博士研究生,研究方向:创新政策,产业研究。
冯海红(1980-),男,河南睢县人,硕士,助理研究员,研究方向:创新政策。
王胜光(1961-),男,山东乳山人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向:创新创业政策。

The comparative analysis on wind energy industry based on the multi-level perspective theory

Li Xiaofen¹, Feng Haihong², Wang Shengguang²

1. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
2. Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2011-10-25 Revised:2012-04-23 Online:2013-07-27 Published:2013-07-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于多级视角理论模型,结合行动者—网络的视角对比了中国、丹麦和德国的风能产业系统的演化,以此探究从风能大国向风能强国的动力和机制。多案例的对比研究促进了多级视角理论的发展,分析表明,发达国家和发展中国家产业的多级视角模型有较大差异:前者起步于利基市场的突破性技术创新;后者起步于技术的引进、消化和吸收,因而系统的演化路径也不尽相同。结论显示,管理体制直接影响产业发展模式和技术创新方式;技术创新、市场需求和制度建设是否协同是影响三个国家产业竞争力差异的关键,因此促进多主体的广泛参与、鼓励多样化的技术创新显得尤为重要。

关键词: 多级视角模型, 行动者-网络, 比较分析, 风能产业

Abstract: Based on Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) theory and the actor-network perspective, the evolutionary of Denmark, German, and China’s wind energy industries is analyzed in order to explore the mechanism of the industry competitiveness. Multi-case comparative studies stimulate the development of MLP theory. The analysis indicates that the MLP models for developed and developing countries are quite different: the former starts from the disruptive innovation in niche market; while the later starts from the introduction, digestion, and absorptive of the existing technologies, thus the evolutionary path of industry is also not the same. It is concluded that the management system directly affects the technological innovation and industrial development modes; the co-evolutionary of technology, market, and institution is the key element affecting the competitiveness difference of these three countries’ industries. Therefore, it is quite important to promote the widest participation of multi-agent and the diversity of technology innovation.

Key words: MLP theory, actor-network, comparative analysis, wind energy industry

中图分类号:

F403.6

李小芬, 冯海红, 王胜光. 基于多级视角模型的风能产业对比研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, (7): 17-23.

Li Xiaofen, Feng Haihong, Wang Shengguang. The comparative analysis on wind energy industry based on the multi-level perspective theory[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (7): 17-23.

参考文献

[1] 王正明. 我国风力发电产业链的培育与发展问题研究 [D].镇江: 江苏大学,2009. [2] 施鹏飞. 中国成为风能强国的差距 [R].北京:可再生能源学会风能专业委员会, 2011. [3] Smith, A., Voβ, J., Grin, J. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi- level perspective and its challenges [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39: 435-448. [4] Verbong, G., Geels, F. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio- technical, multi- level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960- 2004) [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 1025-1037. [5] 卡萝塔· 佩雷兹著,田方萌等译. 技术革命与金融资本:泡沫与黄金时代的动力学 [C].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2007. [6] Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of Technological systems in renewable energy technology [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13: 815-849. [7] Hekkert, M.P., Surrs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O. et al. Functions of Innovation Systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74: 413-432. [8] Szarka, J. Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34: 3041-3048. [9] Geels, F W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study [J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(8/9): 1257-1274. [10] Geels, F W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33:897-920. [11] Geels, F W. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2005, 72(6): 681-696. [12] Geels, F W, Schot, J W Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 399-417. [13] Geels, F W. Analysing the breakthrough of rock ’n’ roll (1930-1970): Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(8): 1411-1431. [14] Geels, F W. Transformations of large technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the Dutch highway system (1950-2000) [J]. Science Technology & Human Values, 2007, 32(2):123-149. [15] Geels, F W. and Kemp, R. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies [J]. Technology in Society, 2007, 29(4):441-455. [16] Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. [17] Schulz, W. Promotion of renewable energy in Germany [A]. In: Jasinski, P., Pfaffenberger, W. (Eds.). Energy and Environment: Multi- regulation in Europe [M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. [18] 李俊峰, 施鹏飞, 高虎. 2010中国风能发展报告[M].海口:海南出版社, 2010. [19] Danish Energy Agency. Wind turbines in Denmark [R]. Copenhagen: the Danish Energy Agency, 2009. [20] Windheim, R. Data supplied by Dr. Rolf Windheim, Forschungszentrum Julich, on projects funded within the federal R&D wind energy program, 2000-3-17. [21] Jacobsson, S, Lauber, V The politics and policy of energy system transformation: explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 34: 256-276.